User talk:Ahmedpk786

Speedy deletion nomination of College Of Tourism & Hotel Management


A tag has been placed on College Of Tourism & Hotel Management, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mdann52 (talk) 13:22, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of COTHM


The article COTHM has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Pretty sure it doesn't meet WP:CORP. Also, this page has been deleted before, see User_talk:Ahmedpk786.  Not sure what's going on.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ToastyMallows (talk) 14:16, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about COTHM
Hello, Ahmedpk786,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether COTHM should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/COTHM.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, ToastyMallows (talk) 12:58, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Removing tags on COTHM
I have restored the tags on the article COTHM. Please note that it is bad practice to remove tags without fixing the problems they correctly identify. Thank you. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:27, 15 March 2013 (UTC)