User talk:Ahmetlii/Archive 2

Rubber stamping GAs
Hi there, I noticed that you have recently did a GA review of 79th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line), but passed the article as meeting all the GA criteria without any evidence of a review being done. If the article is already fully compliant with the GA criteria, justification will be needed as to why the article is compliant, usually done in a section by section breakdown. However, in most cases, there will be issues with the article, and a review of these issues should be provided on the review page for the nominator to fix during the hold period, after which if the issues are resolved the article will pass. An absence of a review is often seen as rubber stamping the GA and the review will normally be undone. I advise you to document a review of the article on the review page and raise any issues in the article if you find any. In the meanwhile you may want to leave the nominator a message that you will be reviewing the article again. If you need reference you can look at other completed GA reviews and also look at other similar GAs to use as a benchmark. 116th Street–Columbia University station is an article of a station on the same line that is already a GA and Cathedral Parkway–110th Street station (IRT Broadway–Seventh Avenue Line) is an article that is currently under review (by me). As I normally say if you don't find something wrong during a review something is wrong. If you have any further queries please so leave me a message on my talk page or ping me. Thanks Pentagon 2057 (T/C) 11:14, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * , thanks. I thought that I addressed the issues, and the issues has fixed. I also think that I said why I accepted it as a GA. Ahmetlii (talk) 11:18, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Ticking the GA checklist is not considered a review, in addition to that i see in an edit you made you added a citation needed tag, which contradicts your assessment that the article is well referenced. The article in this case should have been put on hold to allow the nominator to fix these issues. To allow for the nominator to fix these easily usually a list of issues that need to be resolved will be compiled on the review page along with discussions about these issues. Pentagon 2057 (T/C) 12:32, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Sharif Sheikh Ahmed
You exported File:Somali President Sheik Sharif visits Balad Town 12 (7703057976) (cropped).jpg to Commons. Can/will you also ensure it remains in line with the local file? — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 22:49, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Never mind, the bot eventually updated it. — Alexis Jazz (talk or ping me) 07:08, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Moronga
Hello Ahmetlii! I saw you left me a message about my edit on the Moronga page. I'm not sure if this is the way to send messages - I'm rather new to the Wikipedia format. What happened is I wanted to add Argentina as another country that had Moronga in our cuisine, but after further reading I realized Moronga and Morcilla (What we eat) are different things, so I deleted my edit. I don't know if my "Argentina" entry was restored, but I'm not sure it's accurate. Anyways, thanks for the message!

FioDeste (talk) 15:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)FioDeste
 * , okay, thanks very much for the message. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:31, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Election of 1847
My edit to that document was correct, there were 2 independent democrats in that election, which is where the 2 comes from, but Amos Tuck was also an independent in this election, and he was not an independent democrat. My source is the wikipedia page for the 30th US congress.
 * okay, thanks.Ahmetlii (talk) 19:06, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

Welcome to Milhist!
 Hello  and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:


 * Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
 * The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can [ watchlist it] if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: WPMILHIST Announcements.
 * The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
 * Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you [ watchlist it].
 * The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
 * We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
 * We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
 * If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
 * If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:30, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , you've welcomed me a few days ago, but thanks anyway. :) Ahmetlii (talk) 09:36, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I forgot! :-) Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 10:37, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Edits
Hey Ahmetlii, the edits have been done so that Pashto stress and alphabet tranliteration is per Pashto Alphabets

PashtoPromoter (talk) 09:19, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , oh okay then. I'm re-reverting my reverts. Ahmetlii (talk) 09:53, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks like you've reverted it before me. Thanks! Ahmetlii (talk) 09:54, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

Message from Vassar84
Hey Ahmetlii,

Thank for you message, and help. Could you please proofread my article about Headroom Studios? I understand the inherent conflict of interest, but Headroom Studios has been mentioned in other Wikipedia articles, and I thought it should have its own page. I feel that I have been as neutral and fact based as possible, but I am open to any other edits. Thank you!

Kyle Vassar84 (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Why?
Why do you want to delete Hezhar Saleh article? All the claims have solid sources and he is a very famous singer Please delete it instead Correct it Thanks Aliasghar ghorbandokht (talk) 19:26, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , first of all, you moved it from Draft page, which is not true per draft guidelines. Second, it's written like an advertisement with insufficient sources, which doesn't prove notability. And Wikipedia doesn't care being famous, Wikipedia cares the notability.Ahmetlii (talk) 20:15, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Proposed decision posted at the open Kurds and Kurdistan case
In the open Kurds and Kurdistan arbitration case, the proposed decision has now been posted. Please review this decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. You were notified as you made comments in the case request. For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:08, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Arbitration/Requests/Case/Kurds and Kurdistan closed
An arbitration case regarding Kurds and Kurdistan has now closed and the final decision is viewable at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:


 * Standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for the topics of Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed.
 * is indefinitely banned from the English Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
 * is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
 * is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
 * is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
 * is topic-banned from articles related to Kurds and Kurdistan, broadly construed. This ban may be appealed twelve months after the enactment of this remedy, and every twelve months thereafter.
 * Paradise Chronicle is warned to avoid casting aspersions and repeating similar uncollegial conduct in the future.

For the Arbitration Committee, Dreamy Jazz talk to me &#124; my contributions 14:32, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Discuss this at: 

Professor Albert Adeoye Ilemobade
Hi, along with my cousin Prof Sola Ilemobade, we want to edit the entire profile of Professor Albert Adeoye Ilemobade. I have not made a mistake in editing the page. We want to change the narrative of his profile from his death to the significant work and contribution to humanity while alive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by WarriorGbenga (talk • contribs) 16:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , hello;
 * I've welcomed you, you can look to those links on there. Like every place, Wikipedia also has rules for consistency. Please do not remove death dates from lead per MOS:BLPLEAD, and please refrain from doing edits on articles where you have a conflict of interest, per WP:COI. However, if you want to do edits on an article where you have conflict of interest, please ensure that it obeys to rules on Wikipedia. Thanks for your edits, and welcome! Ahmetlii (talk) 16:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , hello;
 * I have created a draft, please let me have your opinion about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:WarriorGbenga/sandbox/Professor_Albert_Adeoye_Ilemobade WarriorGbenga (talk) WarriorGbenga (talk) 17:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
 * , it would be better if you could cite the informations with citations. I think it's not ready to add to the article at that moment. Ahmetlii (talk) 17:58, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 March newsletter
Round 1 of the competition has finished; it was a high-scoring round with 21 contestants scoring more than 100 points. Everyone with a positive score moves on to Round 2, with 55 contestants qualifying. You will need to finish among the top thirty-two contestants in Round 2 if you are to qualify for Round 3. Our top scorers in Round 1 were:


 * Epicgenius led the field with a featured article, nine good articles and an assortment of other submissions, specialising on buildings and locations in New York, for a total of 945 points.
 * Bloom6132 was close behind with 896 points, largely gained from 71 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 ImaginesTigers, who has been editing Wikipedia for less than a year, was in third place with 711 points, much helped by bringing League of Legends to featured article status, exemplifying how bonus points can boost a contestant's score.
 * 🇷🇼 Amakuru came next with 708 points, Kigali being another featured article that scored maximum bonus points.
 * Flag of the United Nations.svg Ktin, new to the WikiCup, was in fifth place with 523 points, garnered from 15 DYKs and 34 "In the news" items.
 * 🇧🇼 The Rambling Man scored 511 points, many from featured article candidate reviews and from football related DYKs.
 * Standard of Oliver Cromwell (1653–1659).svg Gog the Mild, last year's runner-up, came next with 498 points, from a featured article and numerous featured article candidate reviews.
 * Bennington Flag.svg Hog Farm, at 452, scored for a featured article, four good articles and a number of reviews.
 * 🇺🇸 Le Panini, another newcomer to the WikiCup, scored 438 for a featured article and three good articles.
 * 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Lee Vilenski, last year's champion, scored 332 points, from a featured article and various other sport-related topics.

These contestants, like all the others, now have to start again from scratch. In Round 1, contestants achieved eight featured articles, three featured lists and one featured picture, as well as around two hundred DYKs and twenty-seven ITNs. They completed 97 good article reviews, nearly double the 52 good articles they claimed. Contestants also claimed for 135 featured article and featured list candidate reviews. There is no longer a requirement to mention your WikiCup participation when undertaking these reviews.

Remember that any content promoted after the end of Round 1 but before the start of Round 2 can be claimed in Round 2. Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is a good article candidate, a featured process, or something else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews.

If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth (talk). MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:25, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Useful idiot
Hi Ahmetlii, you asked for a citation or a reference to my last edit to the above article. Here you go: https://intellinews.com/army-aircraft-brings-russian-sputnik-v-vaccine-to-slovakia-204261/ https://balkaninsight.com/2021/02/25/sputnik-vaccine-orbits-slovak-politics/ https://starherald.com/news/world/slovakia-signs-deal-to-acquire-2-million-doses-of-sputnik-v/article_abb99421-3292-5a9f-b27c-40609290332c.html

Let me know if you need anything else. sarmantna teplaren — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:908:161:24A0:E10B:B2:270C:9837 (talk) 14:36, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:NOR. None of the sources mentions the person as "useful idiot" directly. Ahmetlii (talk) 17:35, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

deletion page request
Hi Ahmetlii;

I am an editor at wiki. Now I found a page named "Yang Yang (scientist)" has been tagged and vandalized. I wonder if you could help delete this page.Since now the information on the page is very few and poorly organized.

Best — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tt23323 (talk • contribs) 19:37, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Message from IP
basketball-reference.com is accurate — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.113.141.105 (talk) 15:53, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * According to Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_155, no, it's not. Please open a discussion at WP:RSN if you want. Ahmetlii (talk) 15:59, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Thrash Metal
Hello Ahmetlii, I just wanted to let you know that unless you've actually HEARD the track 15 minutes of fame, you best think before reverting it on the article because it does fit the genre of thrash metal and i even put a link to it because the person who made the song defo should get more internet airplay --2A02:C7F:901F:2A00:A9FE:BCDF:428D:329C (talk) 16:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * The link is not necessary though. If we linked to it, we'd have to link to all thrash metal songs, and opinion of what is "finest" is subjective. Therefore, I reverted your edit. Steve M (talk) 16:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

The link is necessary because you obviously can't take a hint about TheStrober's utter thrashtastic brilliance --2A02:C7F:901F:2A00:A9FE:BCDF:428D:329C (talk) 16:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Please tune down your tone, it's starting to sound like a personal attack — Yours, Berrely  • Talk∕Contribs 16:42, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

I have nothing personally against Ahmetlii, I don't even know the man for a start --2A02:C7F:901F:2A00:A9FE:BCDF:428D:329C (talk) 20:08, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Rollback granted
Hi Ahmetlii. After reviewing your request, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback: If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:32, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
 * Use common sense.

Contested deletion
Ontario Systems should not be speedily deleted because I added verifiable references to New Mountain Capital, Business Wire, Government Technology Agency, PR Newswire, ACA International, Ball State University, Vancouver Business Journal, Beckers Hospital Review, HIT Consultant, etc. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mchkrny (talk • contribs) 19:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Mz7 (talk) 20:27, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Why the article about "Allan Wexler" was deleted?
Hi,

My article "Allan Wexler" was deleted for being promotional. I am new to Wikipedia and after reading the talk page, I am still not clear why it is deleted. Please note that I am not hired or paid for writing this article. Allan Wexler is well-known artist and I provided many resources to prove it. Please help me to understand why my article was deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delightful void (talk • contribs) 20:18, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * @Delightful void Hello, first of all, you've used one primary source which is written by the person and it only includes two citations which seems it isn't verifiable and doesn't prove notability. Therefore, I thought that the page was just for advertisement because it seemed as that since it includes uncited texts and near to none citations. It also qualified WP:A7 for deletion though, but looks like I've forgotten to also tag as that when tagging. Ahmetlii (talk) 20:27, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

About Bashir Ahmed (Bangladeshi athlete)
Hi Ahmetlii,

As far as I can see, this article has been altered to include incorrect dates - "Born 10 October 1980", "National Sports Award (2020)" and so on - which may make it appear a CSD A7 candidate. Thank you for the corrections!

Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 09:45, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Samanea Jakarta
Hello Ahmetlii. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Samanea Jakarta, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There's no reason to delete from mainspace if there's a draft. The draft is unneeded, not the mainspace article. Thank you. Ged UK  16:05, 22 March 2021 (UTC)