User talk:Ahollypak

July 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tales of Xillia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tales of Xillia was changed by Ahollypak (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.939339 on 2014-07-06T09:00:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:00, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=615799018 your edit] to Libyan Airlines may have broken the syntax by modifying 30 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page]. It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:19, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Babita arora  09:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Mass BOT-like deletions of material with no edit summary and edit marked "minor" appear harmful
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is New_Account_Using_AWB_to_Remove_Links_to_archive.is_based_.22the_RFC.22. Thank you.


 * The above is a standard notification template. Your behavior appears similar to that of several apparent bots, and the discussion I linked concerns that. You should at least, as stated in the summary of the RFC, "please be sure to make very clear A) why the community made this decision and B) what alternatives are available to them to deal with rotlink. Ideally someone would create a page explaining the situation and options and link to it in the edit summaries..." It does not seem to me that an empty edit summary and an edit marked as "minor" qualifies as meeting this suggestion. As it is I notice that your changes have been reverted - I would have reverted them a few of them myself, had I not thought to go searching for discussion of archive.is in WP-space.  Jeh (talk) 09:49, 6 July 2014 (UTC)