User talk:Ahoog11/Cranchia scabra

Peer Review

 * I think the wording of the draft so far is in more of a scientific study manner, and might be hard to understand by the common person reading about this species for the first time, especially in the section labeled Dorsal and Ventral chambers and the first unlabeled section.
 * Overall I think this is great work, a lot of time obviously went into the research behind this information, finding credible and helpful information from sources.
 * I'd say going from here, try to focus on more basic information, building up into the more complicated sections you have now.

Michaelbev5 (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I agree with @Michaelbev5! The main thing I would focus on is re-organizing the information presented in the article into appropriately labeled sections and bolded subsections. Additionally, I would work on finalizing the lead once all the information is gathered. --Jdx84 (talk) 17:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)