User talk:Ahpook

Welcome!
Hello, Ahpook, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:


 * If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
 * Always sign your posts on talk pages with  so others will know who left which comments.
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
 * How to edit a page and write a great article
 * The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
 * The handy Manual of Style
 * And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

Sango 123  16:57, July 14, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a comment on my talk page.

Edit summaries
Hi! I noticed that you are trying to put your signature ( ~ ) into your edit summaries. This is not necessary, as the four tildes will not expand to your user name when used in summaries, and the page history will show your user details anyway. The correct place to use the four tildes is in talk pages (such as this one). See also WP:SIG. Hope this helps. Cheers. --Plek 11:45, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Quantum beats
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Quantum beats, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Scog (talk) 22:37, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

KAL 902 and artistic depictions
Artistic depictions are not original research. This has been established in discussions. If you want, I can show you an archive. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:29, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

rocket girl label edits
helllo there

thanks for your edits on this page. i fully agree with you. i'm sorry i haven't had a chance to get involved with the discussions. it's a serious headache knowingly diving headfirst into an edit war and i just haven't had the time, patience or inclination to indulge in another one for now. they're the bane of my life on here. i think i fully consulted policy on various key issues when i made my edits and i think you and I were pretty much in agreement with the direction of how the article should be amended. next time i sit down to address the article, i'll let you know, and will update the talk page and that of other interested parties. likewise, please drop me a message on my talk page if you have another crack at brining the article within guidelines.Rayman60 (talk) 23:46, 18 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi, nice to hear from you. It is developing into a edit war, which I agree, do nothing to improve anything when they occur. I'm hoping we can get to some common ground on the format of the article. I'll drop you a line if anything positive develops. ahpook (talk) 10:56, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

July 2017
Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Chemtrail conspiracy theory‎, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Alexbrn (talk) 15:21, 16 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, Thanks for looking at my contributions. Could you let me know which edit you think shouldn't have been marked as minor, I made a couple to the article. Many thanks. ahpook (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2017 (UTC)
 * This wasn't a minor edit by Wikipedia's definition. Alexbrn (talk) 19:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)


 * You are right, and I stand corrected, I'll take more care in marking my changes in future. I've reverted the article to its original form. Much obliged. ahpook (talk) 19:49, 16 July 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)