User talk:Ahpsp

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * Try the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the test area.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * Remember Neutral point of view
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck!

[[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]]

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).

Marcel Proust Cleanup
Yeah, you can just remove the tag when you think the cleanup is done. Sometimes there's a central listing which should also be removed. In this case, that would be Cleanup/June, but it looks like one was never made for this article. Thanks for your help, Beland 06:07, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

J. R. Ackerley
Hi, Ahpsp,

You added to J. R. Ackerley an observation that We Think the World of You is in part about "the (homosexual) narrator's frustrated relationship with Queenie's (heterosexual) owner." I think I know what you mean here, and probably agree with it, but I would like to clarify what you mean. In what sense did you mean that the relationship was frustrated? Since there's a scene in the novel in which the two have sex the relationship isn't entirely frustrated, although obviously Frank's relationship was frustrated throughout most of the novel by Johnny's being in jail. It would also seem more accurate to me to describe Johnny as bisexual. Anyway, those are just some thoughts. I'd be interested to hear what you think of them. John FitzGerald 13:41, 3 February 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the prompt reply. I thought that was more or less what you intended. Will think about how the entry might be changed, unless you want to change it yourself. I see your point about bisexuality. There are more possibilities than I considered; and perhaps it gives us an interesting view into British society of the time. John FitzGerald 15:50, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Hi, Andrew. I saw your revision of the article. I think it would be good to retain your point about the frustrated relationship, though, perhaps by saying that the relationship was largely frustrated. As it stands, though, your revision is certainly accurate. Thanks for your help. John FitzGerald 15:56, 6 February 2006 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Devil in the Shortwave, Ahpsp!

Wikipedia editor Pigsonthewing just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Please note the subtemplates which I have added to the infobox, and include them in any similar articles you create in future."

To reply, leave a comment on Pigsonthewing's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dilaudid EP, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EP (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia&.
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the [ reviewer's talk page]
 * Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 22:15, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tropical Depression (Mountain Goats) concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tropical Depression (Mountain Goats), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:51, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Tropical Depression (Mountain Goats)


Hello Ahpsp. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Tropical Depression (Mountain Goats)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 19:00, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

File:LSterne.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:LSterne.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. PatHadley (talk) 11:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)