User talk:Ahtufail

February 2019
Hello Ahtufail. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ahtufail. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. bonadea contributions talk 08:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

I have disclosed it in respect of Wikipedia terms, regardless of myself getting paid. The information i posted has been gathered by me to share with positive souls out there willing to do the same positivity around the globe. There has never been an intention of promotion or whatsoever. English is not my strongest suit that's why the literary tone is not synchronizing with Wikipedia's. Ahtufail (talk) 09:08, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

I am all ears and heart to improve myself here. As we all know that learning is life. Ahtufail (talk) 09:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The information i posted has been gathered by me The draft you created is identical to a draft that has been deleted previously, which was created by an account that was blocked. I assume that means that you are the same person who used that account. Please note that creating another account when your previous account has been blocked is not allowed, and using Wikipedia for promotion and advertising is not allowed even if you disclose your employer/client (which you haven't done - the "disclosure" above only mentions a name which appears to be the same as your user name). --bonadea contributions talk 10:33, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I assume that means that you are the same person who used that account. My volunteering friend who worked on the same project as me posted which I re-reviewed later for Wikipedia tone and uploaded here from my account. I assure we are different persons. Secondly, the (deleted) article posted earlier is different in tone, this version which i posted was intended to fall as per Wikipedia policy.
 * Please note that creating another account when your previous account has been blocked is not allowed My account was created well before the first article on the subject was even created, so it has never ever any false intention, neither before nor now.
 * the "disclosure" above only mentions a name which appears to be the same as your user name Its actually my complete name, I am not an employee of the subject. Kindly mention how else can i post/disclose my employer?

I have my other articles too in the line, but first i need need this pilot task to get straight. Ahtufail (talk) 11:53, 4 February 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ibrahim Hasan Murad


A tag has been placed on Draft:Ibrahim Hasan Murad, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 11:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)