User talk:Ahurtado07/sandbox

Everything is really well written and flows very greatly with keeping the style of Wikipedia articles. The image summary is a great add-on. Everything is concise, detailed, and to the point. My only concern was if you were missing any citations in the symptoms and diagnosis sections. Also, just go through and review consistency of bolding the subtopics. Really enjoyed reading it, very easy to follow! Ppatel91 (talk) 18:20, 12 November 2017 (UTC)Priya Patel

- You have a really good start to the article. It is easy to understand and flows from one topic to another without difficulty. - Under Causes and Prevention just be sure to include more details when you are explaining the cause - Could also add some images in sections that have a lot of information to better help the reader understand some complex process you are explaining under mechanism - Overalll really good start! - Charmila Sabbani — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charms022 (talk • contribs) 20:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

Sweiner02 (talk) 18:47, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Nice abstract. Very clear.
 * Needs citations throughout.
 * Needs links throughout.
 * The mechanism is great and detailed, but really isn't in lay language. Parse it out for clarity, link or define difficult terms.
 * Check grammar and clarity
 * Generally, articles for recent research can be summarized in a few sentences. They should just be cited like normal, not separated out with titles. the sections should flow naturally like other sections.