User talk:Ai681

Doki Doki Panic
I see not one shred of content that deals with the video game as if it is important in any way to the real world. No reception, no unique content. The development history/conversion history is adequately covered in the SMB2 article. I would say that it could be summed up in three paragraphs, but ironically, it IS. What is the point of having an article that will always be of lesser quality by design? - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 07:28, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

How do you define real world? Is a page on SMB2 important to the real world? Is a page on Franz Kafka important to the real world? And what is this "lesser" quality you refer to? The previous Doki Doki Panic article had interesting information about the game, which is not included in the SMB2 article. If that information was ALL included, I could see getting rid of the DDP article, but as it stands, the DDP article has interesting and unique information for people interested in Doki Doki Panic. I made this edit as a reader. Quite frankly, I wanted to look up something about DDP, and found the article and information was gone. The section in the SMB2 article does not nearly suffice. YOU may not have interest, but that does not mean others may not have interest.Ai681 (talk) 05:06, 1 December 2009 (UTC)