User talk:Aib2010

Welcome!

Hello, Aib2010, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as America in bloom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Pink Bull  17:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of America in bloom
A tag has been placed on America in bloom requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Pink Bull  17:02, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

America in Bloom
Hi. I have removed most of the material you added to the article, for two reasons: By all means expand the article with more brief, neutrally-written information about what the organization does; but please read Wikipedia is not here to tell the world about your noble cause and Your first article. Your first priority should be establish notability, a requirement to have a Wikipedia article, which is not a matter of opinion but needs to be demonstrated by showing "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject." Significant means more than just listing-type mentions; reliable excludes Myspace, Facebook, blogs, places where anyone can post anything; independent excludes the subject's own website, affiliated ones and anything based on press releases.
 * Large parts seem to be copied from the website and from http://www.americainbloom.org/App_UserFiles/Documents/Files/AnnualReport/09_Annual_Report.pdf, and Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere unless a copyright release has been made as described at Copyrights. Assertion of permission to use is not enough.
 * In any case, this sort of material is not appropriate. Wikipedia should not be approached as a notice-board onto which to pin existing material, which is usually too promotional in character; it is an encyclopedia, its articles require a neutral point of view, and it is not for promotion or advocacy of any kind, however worthy the cause.

When the article was proposed for deletion last year, the concern expressed was: Non-notable organisation. The coverage consists only of press releases in non-independent sources and passing mentions in local media. Coverage in secondary sources is not a head count, what matters is the depth of the coverage. Although any PRODded article is restored on request, I shall notify user who proposed it, and s/he may choose to nominate it at WP:Articles for deletion; that would start a debate lasting seven days, to which you would be welcome to contribute, but adding independent sources would be the best way to avert that.

A minor point: although posts on talk pages should be signed, article contributions should not - because no article belongs to any author, see WP:Ownership of articles; contributions are all recorded in the article history.

Finally, a major point: if you are connected with the organization, please read our guideline for those editing with a WP:Conflict of interest.

Regards, JohnCD (talk) 18:56, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Your username
I am slow today. Only when I saw "Aib2009" in the list of contributors to the article did I realise that your username includes the organisation's initials. That could be a problem if it was thought to indicate that yours is a "role account" belonging to the organisation. It is a strict rule that Wikipedia accounts must be for individuals, who are wholly responsible for them; accounts found to be shared or which appear to belong to an organisation are blocked. I do not think this need be a problem provided it is understood, and you explain to anyone who challenges it, that the account belongs to you as an individual and not to AIB. If objections are raised, or if you prefer to avoid the possibility, you can apply at WP:CHU to change username, or you can simply abandon this account, which has few edits so far, and set up a new one. If you do that, let me know your new username.

Since it is clear that you are connected with AIB, I reiterate that you need to read Conflict of interest, and may also find these helpful: Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:33, 7 June 2010 (UTC)
 * FAQ/Organizations
 * Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest