User talk:Aicjulial/sandbox

Hello classmate! I'm just stopping in to get one of the three peer reviews done for our class assignment. I'm not sure of what I am in need of reviewing. I really dig that you put up references in your sandbox about your article. That seems like the greatest idea, I may need to ditto your actions! I think your doing an awesome job so there isn't much I could critique. Have a great day. (MarcosXavier78 (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC))

Hi just here for another peer review regarding Right on Crime page. I see they mention "reducing crime, lowering costs and restoring victims" as the forefront of their goals and am curious in regards to restoring victims if you could touch on the Restorative Justice model and offer ideas and speculation, proponents and opponents of this approach, etc. I notice this article is mentioning heavily that this is a bipartisian movement in an effort to get the conservative right to take into consideration ideas on reform originally posed by the left, so maybe you could bring up some of the strategies being used by the left to get conservatives to hear them out and be willing to make change. I'll let you know if I think of anything else but this is a great article to choose! Tyler TF951497642 (talk) 09:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Another peer review! It seems like there's some space to add more detail on the goals of the Right on Crime movement. The article states eight overall goals, but doesn't really go into specifics about what each of those mean and the angle from which this movement plans on addressing them. A breakdown of each of those goals could probably even be it's own section. Further, documentation of social and political work done in the name of the movement could be beneficial. Good work! Tarynl (talk) 08:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

Hello, Aicjulial, I am providing you another peer review. You mention the primary issues that 'Right on Crime' focuses upon. However, I would also touch on secondary, where applicable, and if also applicable, tertiary issues which are focused on. I would also integrate more speakers into the Background area, in reference to what they have to say about 'Right on Crime'. Also, what other states are applicable, concerning 'Right on Crime'? Your 'Statement of Principles signatories' seems to be well detailed; I would also consider adding the signatories' statements, in brief, in relation to their signing. Your 'References' list and 'External links' list look good, but I would also consider perhaps integrating more external links. Iivanchentw (talk) 04:46, 23 May 2019 (UTC)livanchentw