User talk:AidanBio4155/Little broad-nosed bat/Jessicaphillips10 Peer Review

First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? - This article does a good job of making sure each section has an equal amount of important information. I was impressed by the many different sections that presented the information in a clear and concise way without being repetitive.

What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? - I would suggest the author to maybe find another source to use in the added section. This may help to give more credible information that avoids having a non-neutral point of view.

What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article? - I think having more than one source for some of the sections would be the best improvement for the article. Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? If so, what? - This article made me think about going back and reading my information to see if I could make some of the sections more concise. Are the sections organized well, in a sensible order? Would they make more sense presented some other way (chronologically, for example)? Specifically, does the information they are adding to the article make sense where they are putting it? - These sections are in a sensible order. I think they are putting information added in a perfect spot. Is each section's length equal to its importance to the article's subject? Are there sections in the article that seem unnecessary? Is anything off-topic? - Each section does have the appropriate length in relation to the article’s subject. I did not find any information that appeared to be off-topic.

Does the article draw conclusions or try to convince the reader to accept one particular point of view? - I do not think there was persuasion to one side of an argument. It felt like a general idea that gives useful information on the subject.

Are there any words or phrases that don't feel neutral? For example, "the best idea," "most people," or negative associations, such as "While it's obvious that x, some insist that y." - There were not any persuading words or negative associations in the article that I found.

Are most statements in the article connected to a reliable source, such as textbooks and journal articles? Or do they rely on blogs or self-published authors? - None of the statements were connected to a blog or self-published author. All of the information came from a credible source.

Are there a lot of statements attributed to one or two sources? If so, it may lead to an unbalanced article, or one that leans too heavily into a single point of view. - There are a lot of statements contributed to one or two sources. I think finding more useful sources and adding them to the article could really enhance the overall topic.

Are there any unsourced statements in the article, or statements that you can't find stated in the references? Just because there is a source listed, doesn't mean it's presented accurately! - No, I did not find any unsourced statements in the article. Most of the statements in the article had a valid source to provide reliable information. Jessicaphillips10 (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2022 (UTC)