User talk:AideeAmaunam

Speedy deletion nomination of Nze Ukwu Nnadum


A tag has been placed on Nze Ukwu Nnadum requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.thecable.ng/nze-ukwu-nwelue-nnadum-one-of-igbos-greatest-orators. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:06, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits to Talk:Nze Ukwu Nnadum while logged out. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of both an account and an IP address by the same person in the same setting and doing so may result in your account being blocked from editing. Additionally, making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. If this was not your intention, please remember to log in when editing. Thank you. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 13:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)


 * That's false. I have not edited that page for weeks, if not months now. When I saw the notice of "speedy deletion", I only contested. I didn't edit the page. Someone else editing means me? Terrible management.
 * If as an admin, you cant pinpoint an edit, that's very improper on your part. IA (talk) 19:07, 10 March 2022 (UTC)

Olumide Longe moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Olumide Longe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:02, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you. and rightly so, it is still a draft. I appreciate you diligence and ensuring standards. I will do the needful 83.137.6.253 (talk) 22:05, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Apparent COI on Draft:Olumide Longe
I note you have already interacted with on operating more than one account please read our policy on using more than one account. Furthermore I have moved your most recent article titled  Olumide Alonge Olumide Longe out of mainspace because it meets at least one  criterion listed in WP:DRAFTIFY. Precisely what I believe to be a strong undisclosed conflict of interest editing, if I may, please in what capacity are you related to the subject of your article? Celestina007 (talk) 22:11, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * I stated earlier, I do not have more than one account. It baffles me that Admin can "suggest" that and it holds water. In these days, its easier to know this. And the onus is on the admins. I do not have multiple accounts.
 * Again, I did not create an article about "Olumide Alonge" but Olumide Longe. Taking it to draft is understood. For me, at that stage it was a draft.
 * And for your question, I am not related to any of them. I am a Nigerian and all of those I edit about are Nigerians. 83.137.6.253 (talk) 22:16, 13 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello I note the sarcasm in this comment “” I’m sorry if you are frustrated, I understand, but it was a very obvious typographical error. Which I have corrected above. Please, moving forward, please do keep this exchange very civil. Furthermore using the word “” would suggest that i have made the typographical error previously, which I clearly haven’t. Furthermore this comment of yours is immaterial to our discussion. So how do you claim not have a conflict of interest but have access to professional photo-shoots? how do you reconcile this disparity?  In your next response could you be so kind as to use the ping function? I’m usually preoccupied with other things that checking manually for a response may be something I’d likely forget to do. Thank you for your compliance in advance  Celestina007 (talk) 23:45, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * If you are anything near Admin, you are terrible at it:
 * 1. I am not frustrated. Why will I be? Edits that are taking my research time? My indication of that error was to call your attention to it. But by your flares, it appears are the only person required to make errors.
 * 2. My exchange are civil, your "weird" understanding is the problem.
 * 3. "Again" is an adverb (modifies a verb) that means "in addition". My usage previously, indicated "In addition to what I have mentioned above...".
 * 4. You asked a question, and I responded, then boom "its immaterial" (to respond). Maybe I should not respond to direct questions here.
 * 5. My response may be immaterial to that direct question. IA (talk) 00:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I’m sorry you feel this way and have resorted to use less than civil tone. I understand your frustration but until such a time you can explain the questions in a WP:CIVIL manner. I have asked about how you acquired the professional images I am afraid I am unable to continue this conversation. Furthermore, for future purposes please do not make the error of casting aspersions or misrepresenting or misconstruing my comments. Your comment above “” is misrepresenting my comments which clearly implied that you being from Nigeria doesn’t “explain away” the WP:APPARENTCOI. Do have yourself a nice day ahead. Oh and lest I forget I see  already warned you about WP:COPVIO, see here please do adhere to their advice. Might I suggest you try and understand our core policies before creating any more articles? You have transgressed on two major of our core policies now. Please take more care moving forward. Oh lest I forget I told you to do well to use the ping function which you failed to do. If there are to be any civil explanations you have moving forward as to how you have access to professional photo shoots please use the ping function. Please it’s like I said; take more care. Peace Profound. . Celestina007 (talk) 01:42, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * @Celestina007 hahaha., you are trying too hard.
 * 1. all the things you accused me of, you are the only violator here. You may need to go back through your comments, in lieu mine. But this time, read with calmness, humility and understanding. Then read again Wikis policies.
 * 2. You said I violated wikis policies. Please, which did I viiolate?
 * 3. Prof Longe is a popular name in Computing in Nigeria. As a follow Nigerian, if you're in computing, you should know this. He has online pages like facebook, isteams etc. His research pictures are all over there. Visiting any of those pages gives you accurate pictures (what you call digital). It might interest you to know I am a computing person, so most folks in this domain in Nigeria, I know their history and simple bio. Again, you should understand the reason I cant understand why you cant tell someone with double logins. I hope this answers your inputs about how i got "digital" pictures.
 * 4. A job of an admin amongst others is to guide a new editor to attain professionalism, not to use vain words.
 * 5. When you created/editted bobriskys article, how did you get the pictures and bio?
 * IA (talk) 10:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * It wasn’t I who added the photo. See who added it here & they did so following every protocol it is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0. Secondly I’m not an admin. Furthermore you have violated our policy on copyright and what Wikipedia is WP:NOT I am afraid I have to take more stern approaches moving forward as you clearly do not seem to be WP:HERE to build an encyclopedia. This is my last response to you. Celestina007 (talk) 13:33, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hahaha.., "our"? Can you write a single line of code outside XML or HTTP? hahha
 * I am not afraid of discipline (encapsulated as "stern approaches" in your subliminal reply). But when it is aimed at a narrative, that is what I don't understand. As far as i know, I just want to have fun here and contribute. So folks like you can't stop me. I just need to do some reading of guidelines and I'll be back. But till then, best @Celestina007 can do is delete my articles. hahhaha. Latter fella IA (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I’m afraid trolling isn’t going to do you any favors, it is indicative of why a block is warranted. I’m sorry but it is my believe that you aren’t here to build an encyclopedia. Celestina007 (talk) 14:14, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Olumide Longe


A tag has been placed on Draft:Olumide Longe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Celestina007 (talk) 13:34, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Hello, AideeAmaunam. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.Deb (talk) 13:40, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
 You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Deb (talk) 14:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. - and well-deserved. Deb (talk) 14:24, 14 March 2022 (UTC)