User talk:Aidylewis

Moved from my talk page
First, don't insert content into a mark-up as you did here. That is reserved for templates. You essentially deleted a template from my talk page and inserted your rant onto my talk page as a template. Seriously?

Why is a commercial tool like Loadrunner allowed to advertise here, but k6 under the AGPL was reverted with no reason given? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aidylewis (talk • contribs) 20:56, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
 * First, it's spelled LoadRunner, with camel case.
 * Second, it's not advertising. As was stated when you complained on Mean as custard's talk page, the list you're thinking should be the exclusive domain for OpenSource software is not an advertising platform for cheap-ass developers with no capital to either advertise or promote their feature-poor software, load testing starts by discussing the subject then it lists notable subjects. In this case, notable means, is sufficiently well-recognized that it has am article on Wikipedia.
 * Third, I did not remove k6 from the list when you added it to that page. I see that Mean as custard reverted your addition to it on the k6 disambiguation page. You should engage that editor and leave me out of your complaint cycle. I did supply a reason for removing the content you removed after Mean as custard reverted you, and the lie (or was it just a misunderstanding, or wishful thinking) you provided in the edit summary when you reverted two notable subjects from the list. The lie: "deleting proprietary software as against wikipedia rules" That reason was: There are no such rules. Take to talk page. In short, there's no free ride for any FOSS on Wikipedia. None. Zippo. Zilch. And commercial or proprietary software is not prevented from inclusion in lists on Wikipedia.
 * Sorry you're not getting to SPAM Wikipedia with this app. Better luck next time. Walter Görlitz (talk) 04:43, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello Walter Görlitz The markdown is non-standard on Wikipedia and I don't particularly care about camel case when travelling and writing on a phone about proprietary software. k6 is a serious new contender in the load testing market and backed by a serious company. Your abuse of other's code is adolescent and shows your inability to even read Go or bother reading the documentation. However from your rant, I realise that the software needs some more notoriety and then a WikiPedia page. AidyLewis 10:18, 6 September 2017 (BST)
 * So what you're saying is you don't care about how we operate or how to communicate effectively. I get it. When you say that Wikipedia markdown is non-standard what I actually hear you saying is that you are not familiar with Wikipedia's use as there's such thing as "markdown" although there is markup and probably more correctly syntax. I take it that you frequently replace text and assume it has no impact on the way a system works, but it's Wikipedia's fault that when you do it here that you break things, not yours. I get it. I also hear you say that you think you know everything (when you know one or possibly two systems) and the way Wikipedia works doesn't fit-in to what you know. I get it. It would have been easier to say, "sorry" and admit that you made a mistake, but again your ego won't let you do that. I get it. And I'm not sure how I (or Mediawiki) have abused code, but, yeah, I get it, any mistakes you make are the fault of someone else, yet you're the one accusing me (or Wikipedia of adolescent behaviour).
 * Notoriety is not quite correct. Recognizabilty is probably better. Notability is the correct term. Apache JMeter breaks all the rules I provided, yet it has a Wikipedia article, because it is so universally well-known that only a fool would challenge its importance, but it's FOSS. Best of luck with k6.
 * You still have not taken responsibility for lying (or whatever it was that you want to say it was when you stated, "deleting proprietary software as against wikipedia rules", but again, that's not your fault. I get it. Walter Görlitz (talk) 22:28, 5 September 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of K6 Load-test tool


A tag has been placed on K6 Load-test tool, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CHRISSY MAD ❯❯❯  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯  10:31, 3 November 2017 (UTC)