User talk:AikiHawkeye

Copy edit request from fellow GOCE member...
Hi there. I just got done with International Space Station, and was wondering if you could give it a look as well (remember to us British English). I've always thought that two sets of eyes are better than one. :) Also, if you have a chance, a comment or two on the peer review page would be awesome... Pax85 (talk) 06:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Awesome. Thank you so much. Would you mind heading over to the ISS talk page, when you have a moment, to let them know that it is on your list? Pax85 (talk) 03:54, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Copyediting
Would you be able to look at Norman Birkett for me? A criticism of it raised at FAC was that it is "too wordy"; obviously as the writer of the article I'm not the best person to work out how wordy is wordy enough :P. Ironholds (talk) 17:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Heh, I just saw your "to-do" list; thanks mate :). Ironholds (talk) 12:05, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for the awesome work :). Ironholds (talk) 18:46, 6 March 2009 (UTC)

Help!
I have improved the article The Last Castle a lot but since I'm not that good in grammar it would be really nice if u checked on it before I do a GA Nomination. Would really appreciate it. Thanks --Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 17:27, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

International Space Station

 * Just to let you know that the article is now up for FAC at Featured article candidates/International Space Station - thanks for the copyedit, and please feel free to comment at the FAC page! :-) Colds7ream (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

hangon
Note: My name is Terrykwon, but what is the template called hangon? I am not sure what itis... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Terrykwon (talk • contribs) 14:16, March 5, 2009 (UTC)

I moved the above comment to your talk page. Terrykwon placed it on your userpage. Frehley Space Ace 21:33, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

Age of Empires copyedit
You don't have to copyedit the article. I've given up on it, so it won't be necessary. Thanks, --EclipseSSD (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Deleted Article
Hello, an article that I added has been deleted because of this 'notability' thing. That's not logical, I added an article about one of very important person, considered by many people as the most important writer in tunisia, and it has been deleted.Why?! —Preceding unsigned comment added by H 09G (talk • contribs) 12:49, 14 March 2009 (UTC)

CSD
Hello,

your CSD request on Killeen Castle has been declined. Thanks!--gordonrox24 (talk) 22:52, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Copyediting
Hey there I was wondering if you could do a copyedit for the February 2009 tornado outbreak article. Showtime2009 (talk) 03:43, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

International Space Station
Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Peer Review as to whether you feel your original comments have been dealt with, if you see any new issues with the article, and whether or not you believe the article will meet the criteria for Featured Article status. Any new comments you have would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Colds7ream (talk) 17:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

ISS FAC4.
Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, or who has contributed to the article recently, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Featured Article Candidacy with any suggestions you have for article improvements (and being bold and making those changes), whether or not you feel any issues you have previously raised have been dealt with, and, ultimately, if you believe the article meets the Featured Article guidelines. This is the fourth FAC for this article, and it'd be great to have it pass. Many thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Wikiout
Clarince63 (talk) 10:36, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Copyedit Backlog Elimination Drive
Hi, as a member of the Guild of Copy Editors you're hereby notified of and invited to participate in the WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Backlog elimination drives/May 2010. Please help us eliminate the 8,000+ copyedit backlog! Participating editors will receive barnstars and other awards, according to their level of participation. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 00:17, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Grab some glory, and a barnstar
Hi, I'd like to invite you to participate in the Guild of Copy Editors July 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive. In May, about 30 editors helped remove the tag from 1175 articles. The backlog is still over 7500 articles, and extends back to the beginning of 2008! We really need your help to reduce it. Copyediting just a couple articles can qualify you for a barnstar. Serious copyeditors can win prestigious and exclusive rewards. See the event page for more information. And thanks for your consideration. ɳorɑfʈ Talk! 14:35, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

GOCE Backlog Elimination Drive Wrap-up
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor at 22:02, 3 August 2010 (UTC).

November 2010 backlog elimination drive update
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of The Utahraptor (talk) at 15:31, 14 November 2010 (UTC).

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors via SMasters using AWB on 01:08, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

November 2010 Backlog Elimination Drive Conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 23:23, 2 December 2010 (UTC).

GOCE Year-end Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

GOCE drive news
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 19:37, 16 January 2011 (UTC).

GOCE January Backlog elimination drive conclusion
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 14:48, 5 February 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:00, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

GOCE elections
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive invitation
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 08:43, 3 July 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 16:00, 21 August 2011 (UTC)

Feral Cats
Your assessment of the "Feral Cats" article was accurate, I'm afraid. Vehemently pro- and anti- cat people are using it as a vehicle for their own beliefs, and objectivity is suffering. Colorado Confederate (talk) 06:36, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 00:37, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 05:48, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

New deal for page patrollers
Hi ,

In order to better control the quality  of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)