User talk:Aimable59

Hi. Thanks for the polite note. :) The article appeared to have been a cut and paste from the original source because of the self-promotional tone.  If it was in fact a direct copy, it simply can't be used here because of copyright issues.  If not, it came across as "spam," another speedy deletion criterion.  It may, however, be used as a reference if it was a cut-and-paste and if you write the article in your own words.  I looked at the deleted version and the organization seems pretty notable.  If you can write it in a more formal and less "adspeak" tone, it should be just fine.  Good luck and don't hesitate to swing by my talk page if you have any other questions. - Lucky 6.9 03:07, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Apologies
After double checking my edits it seems I was the one who accidentally had your comment removed on User:Lucky 6.9's talk page. I offered to help him clean up frequent complaints/personal attacks off his talk page. Your comment is obviously neither a complaint nor an attack, though I accidentally removed it along wiht another entry. Apologies for that again and sorry for the inconvenience. ^_^; -WarthogDemon 04:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)