User talk:Aiman abmajid/Archive 3

Fair use rationale for Image:Gsb3.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Gsb3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Im

Spider (Malaysian band)
The article Spider (Malaysian band) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the notability of the subject may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki (talk) 13:35, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Highways of the Malaysian Federal Route 1331
A tag has been placed on Template:Highways of the Malaysian Federal Route 1331 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

March 2008 collaboration
Hi there. We need more votes again for our March 2008 collaboration. As of February 11, only 5 members have voted. Please do exercise your right to vote! And can you add your name to the list of project members so its easier to locate all participants. Thanks! :-) White2020 (talk) 13:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:50, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:MELogo
A tag has been placed on Template:MELogo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:10, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Malaysian Federal Roads System
A tag has been placed on Template:Malaysian Federal Roads System requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:48, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User Malaysian architecture
A tag has been placed on Template:User Malaysian architecture requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 04:17, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:User Totally Spies fans
A tag has been placed on Template:User Totally Spies fans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Baskin Robbins
A tag has been placed on Template:Baskin Robbins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Baskin Robbins signs
A tag has been placed on Template:Baskin Robbins signs requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (&lt;noinclude>&#123;{transclusionless}}&lt;/noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

England Optical Group
Another editor has added the  template to the article England Optical Group, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Ibrahim Hj Yaacob
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ibrahim Hj Yaacob, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Ibrahim Hj Yaacob. — BradV 17:45, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Jalan Tanjung Tuan
A tag has been placed on Jalan Tanjung Tuan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mhsb (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Evolusi KL Drift
A tag has been placed on Evolusi KL Drift, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:05, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

I've taken the liberty of expanding this somewhat. Very few details were available, but I was able to find a brief synopsis and therefore I was able to add a brief plot summary. In the future, please add a plot summary to film articles. Without one, the article is nearly useless. Thanks. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Saidina Umar Al-Khattab Mosque‎
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Saidina Umar Al-Khattab Mosque‎, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Saidina Umar Al-Khattab Mosque‎. NatureBoyMD (talk) 21:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Little context in Construction signs
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Construction signs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Construction signs is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Construction signs, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:30, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Your poor English
I don't mean to be rude but you changed a spelling correction to the word concessionaire which you spelled as concessionaries. That's a wrong spelling. Check the dictionary before trying to correct other's spelling when you have so much problem writing a proper English sentence. Wai Hong (talk) 14:23, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Gua.com.my
A tag has been placed on Gua.com.my requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 04:08, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

Thailand-road-stub
Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals. This is partly in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies, and partly so that those who regularly deal with stub articles know what stub types are likely to need re-sorting soon. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  02:14, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Contribution
I am quite new to the Wikipedia society, and as a Malaysian and part of the WikiProject Malaysia, I appreciate very much and I'm very glad to see that a person is contributing regularly to providing information to the world about my country. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mhching (talk • contribs) 06:05, 28 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Terima kasih banyak-banyak! (Thank you very much!) - Aiman abmajid 14:50, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

Hi - I see you have recently created one or more new stub types. As it states at Stub, at the top of most stub categories, and in many other places on Wikipedia, it is recommended that new stub types are proposed prior to creation at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, in order to check whether the new stub type is already covered by existing stub types, whether it is named according to stub naming guidelines, whether it is otherwise correctly formatted, whether it reaches the standard threshold for creation of a new stub type, and whether it crosses existing stub type hierarchies. Your new stub type is currently listed at WP:WSS/D - please feel free to make any comments there as to any rationale for this stub type. And please, in future, consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...wha?  02:03, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Copypaste moves (Muar -> Muar (Town))
When you move the content of one page to another please do so by using the move function, by copy and pasting content you are in a legal sense violating the copyright agreement between Wikipedia and ever other user that ever contributed to that page. - Icewedge (talk) 06:57, 11 August 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Institut Kerja Raya Malaysia
A tag has been placed on Institut Kerja Raya Malaysia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Adrianwn (talk) 11:01, 15 August 2008 (UTC)

Tunku Tan Sri Abdullah ibni Almarhum Tuanku Abdul Rahman
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Tunku Tan Sri Abdullah ibni Almarhum Tuanku Abdul Rahman, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.melewar-mig.com/coinfo_tunku.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:15, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Tunku Tan Sri Abdullah ibni Almarhum Tuanku Abdul Rahman
A tag has been placed on Tunku Tan Sri Abdullah ibni Almarhum Tuanku Abdul Rahman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 14:31, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

Road signs in Malaysia
Why some figures in this article are highlighted in yellow?  Otolemur crassicaudatus  (talk) 12:08, 23 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Figures are highlighted in yellow is the route number shield signs. (Highway specialist in Malaysia) 11:40, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ampang River
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ampang River, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Oo7565 (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 1989 Kedah Madrasah fire
An article that you have been involved in editing, 1989 Kedah Madrasah fire, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/1989 Kedah Madrasah fire. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Ecoleetage (talk) 02:45, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

Indonesia Malaysia relations
Please add text or you will find a Prod - it is better to keep articles like that off wiki space until you have text in it - as it is basically a to do and not really anything that resembles an article - SatuSuro 23:56, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Looking at your contribs - I wouldnt be suprised if someone comes along and prods most of your foreign relations articles - it is totally pointless to create articles with unused sections/headings - and no one is going to magically come along and fill the text for you - they might be a good idea but you are cluttering main space with articles with nothing in them - it would be better to create one article with some text in it, rather than what you have done - cheers SatuSuro 00:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Malaysia-Indonesia relations
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Malaysia-Indonesia relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SatuSuro 12:01, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Prods
Please do not create articles and then no actually provide any substance to the articles - please feel free to improve the articles - but also please understand having started but not added anything that can assist a reader with any sense of what you are up to is bad practice - better one article with some WP:RS than a number with none at all SatuSuro 12:05, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Malaysia-East Timor relations
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Malaysia-East Timor relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. SatuSuro 12:06, 20 October 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of a template redirect
I have nominated a redirect to a template for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 14:46, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of a template redirect
I have nominated a redirect to a template for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 14:48, 29 October 2008 (UTC)

A Samad Ismail
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of A Samad Ismail, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/index.php/malaysia/8531-doyen-of-malaysian-journalism-tan-sri-a-samad-ismail-dies. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Spam in Normah Medical Specialist Centre
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Normah Medical Specialist Centre, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Normah Medical Specialist Centre is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Normah Medical Specialist Centre, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 13:50, 1 November 2008 (UTC)

Spam in IOI Mall
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on IOI Mall, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because IOI Mall is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting IOI Mall, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:40, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Spam in IOI Mall
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on IOI Mall, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because IOI Mall is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting IOI Mall, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 12:50, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Slim, Perak
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Slim, Perak, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. PhilKnight (talk) 20:36, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bukit Tagar Landfill
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Bukit Tagar Landfill, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 11:46, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bukit Tagar Landfill
I have nominated Bukit Tagar Landfill, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Bukit Tagar Landfill. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 19:55, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Corporatisation of government bodies in Malaysia
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Corporatisation of government bodies in Malaysia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Listcruft

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. &mdash; G716  &lt;T·C&gt; 19:42, 28 November 2008 (UTC)