User talk:Aimee.ball

A page you started (Purnell Model for Cultural Competence) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Purnell Model for Cultural Competence, Aimee.ball!

Wikipedia editor Doomsdayer520 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for your new article on the Purnell Model for Cultural Competence. However, note that other editors have noticed many problems, which are listed at the top of the article. These issues must be tackled in earnest, or other editors might significantly reduce the article or even delete it. Follow the links in each of the warning messages for pointers on how to fix those issues. Good luck."

To reply, leave a comment on Doomsdayer520's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 17:24, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Purnell Model for Cultural Competence for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Purnell Model for Cultural Competence is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Purnell Model for Cultural Competence until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Purnell Model for Cultural Competence
I've rewritten the lead paragraph of the Purnell Model for Cultural Competence article. If you're still working on the article, I highly recommend following the structure suggested by the lead paragraph. That would mean a (brief) discussion of the model itself, including its origins and basic features, followed by a section on how it has actually been applied in the real world to training and research (supported by citations to relevant studies), followed by a section that discusses the model's limitations and any criticism of the model. In other words, the article needs to be mostly about how the model is widely used, referred to, and criticized. In Wikipedia, the model's influence is what is notable, not its contents. Bakazaka (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2018 (UTC)