User talk:Ainzboogie

License tagging for File:Second adventure cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Second adventure cover.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:06, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Forever_yours_cover.jpeg)
Thanks for uploading File:Forever_yours_cover.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 00:25, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Concept cover.jpeg
Thank you for uploading File:Concept cover.jpeg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 01:09, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Disco fever cover.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Disco fever cover.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:06, 4 April 2011 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Foster promo photo.jpeg
Thanks for uploading File:Foster promo photo.jpeg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. We hope (talk) 17:26, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Changes cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Changes cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:18, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Stephanie (Stephanie Mills album)


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Stephanie (Stephanie Mills album). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Stephanie (album). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Stephanie (album) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. D OOMSDAYER 520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:26, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Categories
Please don't add genre categories to articles under the recording artist's category. Ex. Earth, Wind & Fire (album) is under, which is under the Rhythm & blues and Soul albums categories. Dan56 (talk) 18:45, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Maze Featuring Frankie Beverly albums
Category:Maze Featuring Frankie Beverly albums, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 12:28, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Gil Scott-Heron, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Red links can be left as an indication of an article that will soon be created. Otherwise, they should not be made. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 22:04, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

As I posted before, please don't add genre categories to articles that already have the recording artist's category. If the artist category is already under genre categories, as Category:Gil Scott-Heron is under Category:Soul albums, Category:Funk albums, etc., then it is redundant and unconstructive. Dan56 (talk) 22:18, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Goin' places cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Goin' places cover.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:10, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Solid 1976 cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Solid 1976 cover.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:14, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

Recommendations
You seem to create a lot of album articles that need a lot of work. I'll use Solid (Michael Henderson album) as an example. Thanks. I hope you just look at this as some constructive critism and advice and as a way to improve the look and readability of the articles you create. If you have any questions, I'm happy to help out. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 18:51, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Don't add articles to a category that doesn't exist, such as Category:Michael Henderson albums. Categories should exist prior to putting an article in them or you should create the category yourself (it's easy, just click on the red-link for the category you added).
 * 2) When you create a category such as above, you can add the categories Category:Soul albums and Category:Funk albums to it, so you don't have to put the genre categories in each and every album article you create.
 * 3) Don't add a "reception" section when you are adding only a review template. If you have some prose to add to a reception section, then put it there. Otherwise, just place it under the infobox.
 * 4) Use the correct format for references for reviews. You're adding reviews that result in bare links:
 * 5) * Your incorrect style: results in
 * 6) * The recommended style: will look like this
 * 7) Avoid all the spacing. It is totally unnecessary and makes the article look bad. One space between sections is fine.
 * 8) For the album charts, use the table format as suggested by MOS:CHARTS. Use individual references, even when they are the same, and do not list or link the album title, since that is what the article is about.
 * 9) For the singles charts, don't list a chart if no songs in the list charted on it. What's the point of having a dance chart colum for singles from a 1970 album, for example, when I don't think a dance chart even existed yet.
 * 10) *You can see what I did to the chart tables at Heaven Right Here on Earth.
 * 1) For the singles charts, don't list a chart if no songs in the list charted on it. What's the point of having a dance chart colum for singles from a 1970 album, for example, when I don't think a dance chart even existed yet.
 * 2) *You can see what I did to the chart tables at Heaven Right Here on Earth.

Thanks for the feedback and constructive criticism. I'll will take in your recommendations into future articles and edits that I do. Ainzboogie (talk) 20:06, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your recent edit to Follow the Leader (Eric B. & Rakim album), you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 21:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Bad Girls (album). There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:45, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Better source request for File:Pieces of a Dream We Are One.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pieces of a Dream We Are One.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 04:20, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kleer Intimate Connection.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Kleer Intimate Connection.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Survey for new page patrollers
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Wiki Media Foundation at 10:51, 25 October 2011 (UTC).

November 2011
On articles for albums such as Gambler's Life, could you not put production and release date information under "Reception". What does that have to do with reception? Also, if you are not going to include actual info on a review and only the ratings template, there's really no need for a "reception" section at all. Just put the template under the infobox. Finally, the "external links" section goes under the "references" section. Thanks. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 20:29, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:You and i o'bryan cover.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:You and i o'bryan cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 04:22, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Edmund sylvers cover.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Edmund sylvers cover.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited One of A Kind, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Larry Rosen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:To serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:To serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the work in question.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:43, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Sinbad Album Fold Out.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Sinbad Album Fold Out.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Natural High (Commodores album) and Heroes (Commodores album), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Your edit has been reverted. Dan56 (talk) 17:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ullanda McCullough


A tag has been placed on Ullanda McCullough requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. —Largo Plazo (talk) 23:00, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited All Aboard (Side Effect album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Burbank. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Shot of love cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Shot of love cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

File:Tiger Love Album Cover.jpg
Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 20:53, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

Category:Albums produced by Leo Graham has been nominated for merging
Category:Albums produced by Leo Graham has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Star cheers peaks news lost wars Talk to me 03:23, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Bizarre (album) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bizarre (album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Bizarre (album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. JJLiu112 (talk) 14:25, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Bizarre Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Bizarre Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:14, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Crusaders for Real Hip-Hop


The article Crusaders for Real Hip-Hop has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This rap group does not meet WP:NBAND due to lack of WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. StreetcarEnjoyer (talk)  02:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)