User talk:Aipotu2

September 2022
Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Nick Donofrio have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 05:48, 24 September 2022 (UTC)


 * What I presented was factual. He published a book that is of interest to business leaders and technologists. It covers the subjects listed and includes the interviews with the people listed. How is this any different than s listing of books in Stephen King's biography? How is listing the book any different than entries on the Beatles' discography? I believe the removal of the passage was unwarranted. If there was a particular phrase or word that set you off, let me know specifically and I will edit accordingly. But the it is FACTUAL that he published a book, it is factual the book covers those topics and it is factual that those people were interviewed for it. Help me instead of just ripping material down! Aipotu2 (talk) 14:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I just re-read what was added. I can see two possible phrases that set you off. The rest is facts. Aipotu2 (talk) 14:11, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Disappointed in no guidance or response. I'm new to this process and want to contribute. Unfortunately, this just reenforces my concerns that a bunch of technocrats are patrolling Wikipedia with now real interest in improving the content but rather asserting some sort of warped geek power. Extremely disappointed. Aipotu2 (talk) 01:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)