User talk:AirFrance358/archive1

Stop wiping sockpuppet tags
Do not interfere with sockpuppet tags, as you did to User:Gabeyc, User:OverQQ, and User:BBOPOPOS. It is considered disruptive as it hides the connection between these accounts. If you wish to dispute these claims, you can do so by posting to WP:ANI, but your edits are opposed by both Nlu and me, and probably as well. &mdash;dgies tc 02:27, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeatedly blanking sockpuppet tags after warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. &mdash;dgies tc 03:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC) &mdash;dgies tc 03:43, 14 May 2007 (UTC) How about the anom. user to stop doing contested things? I know you are doing it for Wikipedia.., but.. ??--AirFrance358 03:46, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Can you please release the block at least in the user page?
Release the block in user page.
 * All blocks are site-wide except for the user talk page. You can still make test-edits on this page, but disruptive behavior will result in even this page being locked.   &mdash;dgies tc 03:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not being disruptive... I think it is admin power abuses to block user in order to make user to learn lessons... Also, here is my suggestion; erase the note in the User:Gabeyc, User:BBOPOPOS, User:OverQQ. I found one thing true; User:63.135.11.194 is used by me. That's true since sometime I forget to sign up. You can keep that sign in User:63.135.11.194. However, other is not true. Here is my deal; erase the note in the users

pages and I will no longer states protests against User:NlyouBBang or many admins.--AirFrance358 04:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Unblock..

 * Falsely attributed comments such as this do not help your credibility. -- Kinu t /c  04:39, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I stopped! Booh... Hurray!
Cleared... -Yes, I give up putting unblock template because of some misunderstandings of many users. -So, I will no longer protest about the issues, but suggests the change from established master of sockpuppet to non or suspected master of sockpuppets. Release the block in user page.
 * All blocks are site-wide except for the user talk page. You can still make test-edits on this page, but disruptive behavior will result in even this page being locked.   &mdash;dgies tc 03:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm not being disruptive... I think it is admin power abuses to block user in order to make user to learn lessons... Also, here is my suggestion; erase the note in the User:Gabeyc, User:BBOPOPOS, User:OverQQ. I found one thing true; User:63.135.11.194 is used by me. That's true since sometime I forget to sign up. You can keep that sign in User:63.135.11.194. However, other is not true. Here is my deal; erase the note in the users

pages and I will no longer states protests against User:Nlyoucrasy or many admins.--AirFrance358 04:11, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

However, please remove the category:Sockpuppet of AirFrance358 and move it to Category:Suspected sockpuppet of AirFrance358. Do you say that Gabeyg is my puppet? It is same as me as it is my previous ID! It should not be considered as puppets, and the user page of Gabeyg should be redirected.--AirFrance358 20:52, 14 May 2007 (UTC)math>E=MC2

It was joke.. Sorry.. I'm sorry that I can not contribute to Wikipedia... --AirFrance358 21:35, 14 May 2007 (UTC) $$admin=courge+good+against vandalism.$$