User talk:Airborne84

Organizing
After reorganizing the list page earlier today, I decided to go through the whole play-by-mail games category (well, not the video games) and sort everything there into categories. I skipped everything that you started or already edited in any significant way. This way, if you want to think about what else you can work in, maybe this is a bit easier than just staring at a few dozen articles in a category? :)

First of all, there is Nuclear War (play-by-mail game) which I started as a redirect in a similar way to the Illuminati PBM, in the thought that maybe one day an article can be created from that.
 * Special

Galaxy II was an article that went to AFD and got redirected to the list (last good version of article:) but I will say that one of my favorite things to achieve on Wikipedia is to get an article previously deleted for notability reasons to be restored once sources are found.

Battle of the Gods (play-by-mail game) was actually deleted at AFD as mentioned above, but the same principle applies here. You will not be able to see the deleted edits, but this game by Integral Games did have a Dragon review, so if more sources are ever located then it can be undeleted.

Duel2 (aka DuelMasters) was an article redirected to the publisher until I found one review and restored it. Could still use more work though, but one review is better than zero.

Just a list, they are pretty much all in the same shape Hyborian War was when you found it: Alien Conflict, The Assassin's Quest , Catacombs of Chaos , Crime Lords (play-by-mail game), Cyborg (play-by-mail game), Galactic Conflict , Infinite Conflict , LandLords , Lords of Valetia , Raumkrieg, Realms of Sword and Thunder, Space Battle (play-by-mail game) , Star Cluster One, Star Trek: The Correspondence Game , Star Venture , Strategic Conflict , Talwaithe, Trajan's Treacherous Trap , Universe II , Warp Force One , Wofan, and Zorphwar. They need a ton of love because they only have one source each (so far) so they may be targeted for deletion or redirection one day. No idea which ones are the most salvageable.
 * Stubs that I started


 * Stubs that I started, but are in a little better shape
 * Empyrean Challenge (it does have another review to be added, so that is better than most of the other stubs)
 * Heroic Fantasy (this one too has another review to be added)
 * Space Combat (play-by-mail game) (another stub with another review to be added)
 * Starlord (play-by-mail game)
 * Warp Force Empires (this one has another review to be added)


 * Articles that I started, but other people developed
 * Alamaze – got a Dragon review and an Origins Award, plus a review in White Wolf that I do not have a copy of. Looking good!
 * Capitol (play-by-mail game) – has two reviews, so it is better than most of my PBM articles
 * Pellic Quest – a few reviews on this one!
 * Quest of the Great Jewels – two reviews on this one as well
 * Starmaster (play-by-mail game) – has two reviews
 * The Tribes of Crane – a few reviews for this one!

Again, just a list – most are unsourced or poorly sourced, and I have no idea if they can be fixed or if it is even worth working on them: Adventurers Guild, The Ashes of Empire, The Glory of Kings, Lords of the Earth , Saturnalia (PBM)
 * Articles I have not worked on that are in bad shape

That is, they are not likely to be deleted, but still could use some work:
 * Articles that I did not start and are probably fine
 * Correspondence chess
 * Legends (PBM)
 * Middle-Earth Play-By-Mail
 * Starweb

Hopefully that breakdown is helpful. :) BOZ (talk) 23:26, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Very helpful @BOZ, thanks. I apparently have picked up the PBM bug and will keep after this for a few more months at least. I suspect I'll be able to get about 3-5 more articles in—while improving some of the ones I've started or modified—before real life picks back up and I'll have to pause for a while. Really appreciate your efforts and thoughts above though. Helpful in identifying which areas to focus on with limited time and resources! --Airborne84 (talk) 23:44, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 * @BOZ, if agreeable, please just strikethrough articles when you're happy they're safe from an AfD or other. Will help me see what I've worked on as well as navigate to it later if needed, since for many I probably won't contribute sufficiently to feel like it's enough to list on my user page. And I'd hate to lose the well organized outline you've created here. :) Thanks! --Airborne84 (talk) 16:15, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, fair enough! I restored anything else that I removed previously, with a strikethrough on those as well. :) BOZ (talk) 18:10, 29 March 2020 (UTC)
 * @BOZ, I'll check on Landlords. Airborne84 (talk) 01:05, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Cool, thanks, let me know. :) BOZ (talk) 21:23, 1 April 2020 (UTC)
 * &BOZ found one! :) There's probably one or two more floating around out there in Gaming Universal and/or Flagship, but my collection is incomplete. It's hard to get copies of a lot of those nowadays. Airborne84 (talk) 02:53, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks for finding at least one more review on that one; good work as always! BOZ (talk) 04:11, 2 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Could you please take a look at Infinite Conflict next? BOZ (talk) 12:30, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Doesn't ring a bell, but sure, I'll take a look. --Airborne84 (talk) 15:55, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

@BOZ, didn't come up with much on this one. It's listed in Paper Mayhem #15 (Nov/Dev 1985) in the PBM game listing (trivial mention), and two issues later in #17 in a section under Gemini Games with four paragraphs of "in-game" material which isn't suitable for a Wikipedia article. My next issue is #22, so it's possible there is more on this game in the other "between" issues I don't have. I also have an Aug/Sep 1987 Gaming Universal, with no mention of it, but no adjacent issues. Those are hard to find. I have most of the White Wolf Magazine issues, but they didn't run that many PBM articles other than their annual PBM issues (usually one article per issue) and I just recently ran through them and don't recall Infinite Conflict coming up. At this point, I don't know if this PBM game is notable enough and the sources exist but I just don't have them, or it was just an extremely short-lived game and it is one of the few that are just destined to fall below the threshold of notability for Wikipedia. Airborne84 (talk) 03:16, 11 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking that one, something may always turn up later. Meanwhile, do you see anything else for Trajan's Treacherous Trap? BOZ (talk) 12:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)


 * @BOZ wow, that's an old one! Afraid I don't have anything on that one. --Airborne84 (talk) 18:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Do you see anything for Talwaithe? BOZ (talk) 12:24, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 * @BOZ, not that one either. I have a listing in a 1986 issue of Paper Mayhem of the PBM games they were tracking. Not a rating list—just a list of existing games. It's not listed. (Nor is Trajan's Treacherous Trap) I have a few 1984 Paper Mayhem's as well, but Talwaithe isn't anywhere in them that I could see. Airborne84 (talk) 23:23, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

I found this one while trolling through the online version of Pyramid in case you can put it to any use: http://www.sjgames.com/pyramid/sample.html?id=363 BOZ (talk) 01:14, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Hey there, I know you are busy at the moment, but if you find any time to add anything from Paper Mayhem to Crasimoff's World which I started today, that would be great. :) BOZ (talk) 18:00, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . I don't recall seeing Realms of Sword and Thunder in Paper Mayhem. Might still be in there somewhere. I'll rummage through sometime later this week. My ability to do so will drop off next week for a while. I missed your note on Crasimoff's World. Will check that as well. Focused on Hyborian War's nomination right now as it's stalled, unfortunately. Airborne84 (talk) 18:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries, and I hope all goes well with that. Another user found an article in Dragon that covered this game and several others briefly, and a few in more detail, so I added to the reception section of all which already had articles. :) BOZ (talk) 12:55, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
 * , didn't find anything on these two, unfortunately. Airborne84 (talk) 03:28, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for checking! BOZ (talk) 03:31, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I found a rather unexpected source for a review for Crasimoff's World, and other PBMs: https://archive.org/details/Computer_Gamer_Issue_03_1985-06_Argus_Press_GB/page/n41/mode/2up :) BOZ (talk) 22:57, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Nice find @BOZ! I think I can put that one to good use now. Side note: I found an advertisement in Flagship #4 for Crasimoff's World where the company (Adventures by Mail) noted that the editors of GAMES magazine chose one of their other games, BSE, as a top 100 game. Will have to look into GAMES magazine. Airborne84 (talk) 23:20, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Hey there! :) I'm still going through White Wolf periodically when taking a break from going through White Dwarf, and I am at issue #21 today. I don't have anything to request from you this time, but I figured I would share a couple of things with you. First of all, RPGnet does not always list the games by name (since they are not RPGs after all) but the review column for PBMs in this issue covered "a half-dozen": https://index.rpg.net/display-entry.phtml?articleid=33512 Also interesting, in the capsule reviews section the issue covers a publication called "The 1990-91 Who's Who Among Play-by-Mail Gamers": https://index.rpg.net/display-entry.phtml?articleid=33514 Now, I did not think it made much sense for me to start an article about that topic, but I figured maybe you could make use of it in the main PBM article or someplace? BOZ (talk) 17:00, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks @BOZ. Unfortunately, I don't have White Wolf No. 21. Too bad. Will rummage around and see if there's one for sale in the next couple of weeks. Airborne84 (talk) 20:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Someone helped me find another good magazine source for games, Games International (which later became a video games magazine). They did run a PBM column for a while, see for example issue 1, issue 2, and issue 6. I am still going though the 16 issues that I have access to (that may be all there ever was) so I will let you know if I spot more in the second half of the run. :) BOZ (talk) 21:38, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Another unexpected PBM source, issue #36 of Computer Gaming World has an article on pages 40-41 that details It's a Crime, Fleet Maneuvers, Illuminati, and Feudal Lords, and the article hints at future installments so I will let you know when/if I come across those. :) BOZ (talk) 22:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

If you have White Wolf #23, it has a review of a PBM called Death & Sorrow: BOZ (talk) 01:38, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I will be looking at issue #24 tomorrow, which has a review of two PBMs, Dark Blades and The Land of Karrus: BOZ (talk) 23:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

I don't know if you have an idea on how to access it, or if it would even be worth looking at, but the French magazine Casus Belli did a review of a PBM called "En Garde!": BOZ (talk) 05:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey! Another one called "Quest" from a different issue of the same magazine: BOZ (talk) 03:13, 27 December 2020 (UTC)
 * And another: BOZ (talk) 03:18, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

I'm not sure if this is along the same lines as a typical PBM game, but today I added a review for a postal version of Railway Rivals. BOZ (talk) 06:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Imagine magazine did a profile on four PBM games over a span of I think three issues; I looked at the first of these issues today and added commentary to three articles and started a new one for Warboid World . :) BOZ (talk) 19:56, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

I saw today that The Games Machine did an article on PBM in 1989: BOZ (talk) 17:32, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Computer Gaming World #100 has an article about Diplomacy and other PBEM games on Compuserve, p154: https://www.cgwmuseum.org/galleries/issues/cgw_100.pdf BOZ (talk) 16:44, 12 January 2022 (UTC)

I meant to share this with you, all the PBM articles I found in early issues of The Games Machine: BOZ (talk) 02:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The Games Machine #6: PBM
 * The Games Machine #7: PBM
 * The Games Machine #8: PBM
 * The Games Machine #9: PBM
 * The Games Machine #10: PBM
 * The Games Machine #11: PBM
 * The Games Machine #12: PBM
 * The Games Machine #21: PBM
 * The Games Machine #22: PBM
 * The Games Machine #23: PBM
 * The Games Machine #24: PBM
 * The Games Machine #25: PBM


 * Thanks @BOZ! Very helpful! Airborne84 (talk) 00:39, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm always finding more, in unexpected places! Check these out from Asimov's Science Fiction:. BOZ (talk) 12:38, 26 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks ! Airborne84 (talk) 01:19, 27 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Paper Mayhem for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Paper Mayhem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Paper Mayhem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Largoplazo (talk) 01:47, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

White Wolf Magazine
Hi there! I have seen in places before where you had access to White Wolf? Would you have access to issue #36 for the review of Asticlian Gambit ? BOZ (talk) 13:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * @BOZ Yup. I added it to the article. It wasn't a huge review, but it's added. Airborne84 (talk) 18:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Good deal, thanks. :) There are a ton of games reviews in White Wolf, but if you don't mind, could I trouble you do see what you can do about Monster Mythology which was reviewed in the same issue, and Black Flames which was reviewed a few issues later? BOZ (talk) 21:00, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Will do. Might take a few days, but I'll take a look. Airborne84 (talk) 22:29, 19 April 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you kindly! :) BOZ (talk) 04:44, 21 April 2020 (UTC)
 * @BOZ, sure. I also put some block text in so that you can break it up or paraphrase how you'd like. Airborne84 (talk) 17:46, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

Hey there! Thanks a bunch for hitting these up. I moved Arcane Shadows and Dragon's Crown (module) to draft space; they were reviewed in White Wolf #35 and #38 respectively, so would you mind adding those reviews if you have access? BOZ (talk) 02:46, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, I'm not sure how much access you have to older issues, but... 11 PBM reviews in issue #10 from the late 1980s if you are interested, just in case. :) BOZ (talk) 18:33, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sure, I can add the reviews from White Wolf 35 and 38. Will do it this week. Real life is re-emerging and I'll be around less and less, but no problem on this. I've got White Wolf #10 as well. Nothing spectacular in there as I recall. Possibly useful to add for WP:GNG for an article or two. Airborne84 (talk) 04:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Excellent, whatever you can do here and there is great. :) I am still thrilled with how much good work you were able to do in a short amount of time. BOZ (talk) 15:00, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Well done as always. I have one more thing for now, if you can find the time. I was going through the index of White Wolf at RPG.net to add a note about the review to existing articles and create new ones when there is no article. In most cases when creating a new one, I can find additional reviews to help make sure it meets the GNG. In the minority of cases where I don't find another review, I was wondering if you would be willing to add the White Wolf review to the articles? Right now, I am just talking about three articles for BattleTech from White Wolf #7: Tales of the Black Widow Company, BattleTech: Map Set 1 , and Decision at Thunder Rift . I will probably add more later, but those are all I have right now. BOZ (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I have most of the White Wolf Magazines, but I don't have issue #7. For some reason, it's not available digitally, and I never got a hard copy. Airborne84 (talk) 04:22, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Ah, oh well! That's fine, don't want to take your attention away from Hyborian War. :D BOZ (talk) 04:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

If you have issue #12, I started articles for The Adventurers' Guild Bestiary, Adventurers' Guild Bounty Hunters' Handbook , The Adventurers' Guild Tome , I wanted to see if anything can be done with those. BOZ (talk) 05:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi . I have that one. I can help out with those this week. Airborne84 (talk) 00:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thanks. I'm going to pick back up with issue #13 later today, which among other things, I know had a review for Kings & Things (play-by-mail game) and another PBM called Kings War per . BOZ (talk) 12:15, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hmm, do you have access to that review for Kings War or any other sources for it? BOZ (talk) 14:42, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Yup. Will add it later today. Airborne84 (talk) 01:34, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Hey hey! :) Now that the FAC is successful, if you have a spare moment, still on issue #13 of White Wolf, I moved Rollout: The Game of the Risk-Takers and The Make My Day Card Game to draft space for now, would you be able to add bits from the reviews for them? BOZ (talk) 00:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I started Domination (play-by-mail game) if you have a copy of that review from issue #18 or any other sources you would want to add. :) BOZ (talk) 17:05, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I started several more articles from the next issue #19, in particular two more PBMs Conquest (play-by-mail game) and The Final Campaign . That's it for now from WW, more in another week or two. :) BOZ (talk) 00:03, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * No problem. I actually don't have White Wolf #18. One of the few I don't have. But I had a rather strange article from a Paper Mayhem on Domination. It was written in a strange manner and would be hard to paraphrase from to detail gameplay (so I won't), but it helps for WP:GNG, I suppose.
 * I'll be slowing down on Wikipedia. Probably will pick one day of the week and edit. Feel free to list projects you're working on like you've been doing and I'll tinker with them as I get time. Airborne84 (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2020 (UTC)
 * OK, no problem, you have done quite a lot. :) So for issue #19 when you can get to it, aside from the above two PBMs for which you may have additional sources, I also started a few more today including The Cyclopedia Talislanta Volume II: The Seven Kingdoms, The Stormrider , The Palladium RPG Book 4: Adventures in the Northern Wilderness , and Lejentia Campaigns Book 1: Skully's Harbor if you don't mind adding something to each of those from the review. BOZ (talk) 03:41, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Sorry for a big request, but... if you have access to the White Wolf reviews listed on any of the following pages, would you mind adding the reviews if you can find the time?: Forgotten Realms Adventures (23), Draconomicon, Horde Campaign , The Ruins of Undermountain (30), Gold & Glory , The Great Glacier , Volo's Guide to Waterdeep (36), The Code of the Harpers , The Ruins of Myth Drannor (40), The Shining South (41). If it helps, some of those article are basically empty placeholders so those would be a higher priority. Thanks for any help you can provide on those. BOZ (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks again for tackling those - a user added PRODs and some AFDs to over 70 articles (more than a few of which did already clearly meet the GNG, while others like these just needed their sources added) so I appreciate the part you were able to do here. :) Even if some of them have to get merged later, at least now there is a source worth preserving and hopefully more sources will be found in time. BOZ (talk) 04:14, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I was going through an index I had made of D&D books with White Wolf reviews, and I found that Ship of Horror and The Complete Book of Gnomes & Halflings had been previously redirected, so I went ahead and restored them and moved them to draft space; when you get a chance, would you please be able to add something from the review to each of those? Much appreciated, anything you can do for them. :) BOZ (talk) 22:27, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Would you be able to add something from the review to GURPS Espionage ? BOZ (talk) 22:42, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

If you find a copy of issue #21, then yesterday I started Edge-On and Rockerboy. BOZ (talk) 04:38, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
 * In case you have issue #22, apparently there is a PBM version of Monopoly?: https://index.rpg.net/display-entry.phtml?articleid=19991 Also, if you are able to add reviews to any of these newly created articles which were featured in that issue: I started articles for Legendary Lives Player's Primer, Legendary Lives Referee's Rulebook , Age of Ruin (role-playing game) , Paranormal Animals of North America , The Living Land . BOZ (talk) 18:30, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks @BOZ. I added the Monopoly PBM info at the Monopoly article here a while back. I'll try to chip away at the other things over the next month or two, but it'll be a bit. Work has been picking back up. Happy editing! Airborne84 (talk) 05:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Working on issue #23 today, I started articles on three supplements: CyberRogues, The Nile Empire , Sprawlgangs & Megacorps . BOZ (talk) 17:37, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I did issue #24 today, so if you have access to that one I started several new ones: Tales of the Dark Ages, The Order of Hermes , Kingdom of Champions , The Zodiac Conspiracy , Gorgoroth (Middle-earth Role Playing) , The Destiny Map , The Possibility Chalice , The Restless Dead (Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay) . BOZ (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
 * One of these days I hope to get access to copies of White Wolf myself, but in the meantime anything you can do to help add any of these reviews is appreciated. :) Today, I started a bunch from WW #25: The Sorcerer's Slave, The Tempest (Ars Magica) , Champions in 3-D , Day of the Destroyer , Invaders from Below , Fantasy Hero Companion , Grey Worlds , Ghost Warriors , Eldarad: The Lost City , The Universal Brotherhood , Nomads of the Nine Nations , Mythic Egypt , Norek: Intrigue in a City-State of Jaiman , Shields of Power , Sky Giants of the Brass Stair , Survivors' Guide to the United Kingdom , White Eagle (Twilight: 2000) . BOZ (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your efforts @BOZ. I just don't have as much time anymore. I'll try to do a bit here and there though. Airborne84 (talk) 03:16, 26 November 2020 (UTC)
 * No worries on that, just do what you can when you can. Mostly, if any of these get challenged then I will ping you. BOZ (talk) 17:09, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

Hey there! :) Would you be able to add a little from the White Wolf review to Darklords ? BOZ (talk) 04:20, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
 * If you get a chance, would you mind adding something from the reviews to Celts Campaign Sourcebook, Hordes of Dragonspear , and Islands of Terror ? BOZ (talk) 04:03, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Done. Sorry I don't have time to do more . Hope that helps! --Airborne84 (talk) 02:07, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries, thanks for getting those! BOZ (talk) 02:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
 * If you have the time, would you be able to add something from the reviews in issue #35 to Fighter's Challenge, Wizard's Challenge , Dune Trader , and Slave Tribes? BOZ (talk) 15:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)
 * @BOZ, I'll pass on this one. I don't have the module to read it, but from the tone of the review I think I'm not the person to address this one. Airborne84 (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Yikes, gotcha! :o BOZ (talk) 18:28, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No worries @BOZ. Airborne84 (talk) 23:48, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * GURPS Atomic Horror is currently unsourced; do you have the review from #37 to add? BOZ (talk) 13:19, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

If you have the time, would you mind adding something from the reviews in issue #36 to Veiled Alliance, and issue #37 to The Murky Deep , Swamplight , and Roots of Evil (Ravenloft) ? BOZ (talk) 18:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that! :) If you have time to tackle some more, whenever you get around to it could you take a look at these from issue #38: Deck of Magical Items, Creative Campaigning , The Knight of Newts , Sons of Azca , and Rage of the Rakasta . BOZ (talk) 04:04, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Happy to help . I'm about to take a break from Wikipedia for a while, so I finished these up. Happy editing! Airborne84 (talk) 15:04, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Sounds fair and thanks, have a great break time. :) BOZ (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Whenever you have the time and inclination for more, could you please take a look at Cleric's Challenge from #40, Tales of Enchantment and Thief's Challenge from #42, and New Tales: The Land Reborn from #43? BOZ (talk) 18:30, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Awesome, thank you as always. :) There are a bunch more D&D articles left that could use a blurb from White Wolf, but of the ones that I started over a decade ago as empty skeleton articles, there are only two left that have no other sourced content: Van Richten's Guide to the Lich from #44 and Van Richten's Guide to Werebeasts from #45. :) BOZ (talk) 21:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
 * @BOZ, was able to do the first one, but I don't have issue 45, unfortunately. Airborne84 (talk) 00:02, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

That was it for those many bare skeletal articles with no real content... I've got some D&D articles that do have at least have some content but are in need of at least one independent review, so that's a bit less work if you don't mind continuing? If so, for starters a few of the articles that have no independent reviews in the reception section are Greyhawk Adventures (issue #13), The Complete Priest's Handbook and The Complete Wizard's Handbook (issue #23), and Greyhawk Ruins (issue #24). BOZ (talk) 00:22, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Got a little time for any of these? :) BOZ (talk) 01:10, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for Greyhawk Ruins, do you have access to #13 or #23? BOZ (talk) 22:00, 7 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I do @BOZ. Will get to those eventually! Airborne84 (talk) 22:02, 7 August 2022 (UTC)

Awesome work as always, thank you. :) A few more for next time, these articles only have reviews from Dragon so they need independent reviews: Dark Sun Boxed Set (issue #30), From the Ashes, Al-Qadim: Arabian Adventures, and Land of Fate (issue #34). BOZ (talk) 21:21, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @BOZ, I can help with the first one. I don't have issue No. 34 though. Airborne84 (talk) 01:50, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Well that's something at least, thanks! :) BOZ (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
 * OK, unperturbed! I believe you have issue #35, so would you be able to add anything to Treasures of Greyhawk, Rary the Traitor , Dragon Kings , Night Howlers ? BOZ (talk) 13:33, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Whenever you have time for more, from issue #36 we have Golden Voyages and Van Richten's Guide to Ghosts, and from issue #40 we have Champions of Mystara , and the two volumes of The Magic Encyclopedia are reviewed in both of those issues. :) BOZ (talk) 03:24, 5 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Awesome, and thank you as always! Two more sets of these to go for the "no independent reviews yet" D&D articles, so the first set of those is Book of Artifacts and Doom of Daggerdale from #41, and Secrets of the Lamp and House of Strahd from #42. :) BOZ (talk) 08:09, 15 February 2023 (UTC)
 * OK, and thank you once again! To finish up the "no independent reviews cited yet" D&D articles, that leaves us with this batch: White Wolf #43 had Iuz the Evil, Assassin Mountain , and Castles Forlorn ; and White Wolf #44 had A Dozen and One Adventures . Whatever you can do with any of those, as always, would be great. :) BOZ (talk) 04:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome work, and thank you for finishing these. :) That takes care of the D&D articles with the greatest need to get sources on them. BOZ (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)

OK, if you are willing to stick with me a bit longer, there is one more set of D&D articles needing White Wolf reviews, and this should be the smallest set yet. This set all has at least one independent review on the article already, but I figure we could always use one more. :) First of all, going through the rest of my list, the Second Edition Player's Handbook had a review in White Wolf #17, while The Complete Fighter's Handbook, The Complete Thief's Handbook , and the original Ravenloft Campaign Setting were all reviewed in White Wolf #23. BOZ (talk) 02:52, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome, and thank you. :) When next you have an opportunity, would you please take a look at The Castle Guide and Legends & Lore from #27, and Arms and Equipment Guide and Tome of Magic from #30? BOZ (talk) 04:34, 24 June 2023 (UTC)
 * You're rocking it. :) Why not, whenever you're ready, here are the rest of the D&D books from my reviews list!: Monstrous Compendium Dark Sun Appendix: Terrors of the Desert from #35; Forbidden Lore from #36; The Complete Book of Humanoids, Creature Catalogue , and Dungeons & Dragons Dungeon Master Screen from #38; and The Complete Sha'ir's Handbook from #50. BOZ (talk) 03:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks @BOZ. I can't find those reviews in #38. Perhaps they are in a different issue? Airborne84 (talk) 16:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC)
 * RPGnet says they are on pages 65 and 68 respectively: BOZ (talk) 02:13, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome, awesome, awesome, you've done amazing to get through nearly all of the D&D reviews from White Wolf. :) I know you had objections to doing the review for Slave Lords, and let me know if you ever get access to issues # 34 or 45, which are noted above, but that is finally it for D&D. :) BOZ (talk) 03:41, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Happy to help @BOZ! Airborne84 (talk) 23:39, 9 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks @BOZ, but I'm going to take a break from Wikipedia for a while. A bit frustrated by some recent events here and I have a busy schedule in the months ahead anyway. Happy editing. Airborne84 (talk) 23:54, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for all you've done, and hope to see you back one day. :) BOZ (talk) 03:33, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

OK, so if you are still willing to hang with me on White Wolf, I was hoping we could go back and look at more reviews? So far, I went through all the D&D product reviews from the entire run of the magazine with you, as well as reviews for articles that I started up through issue #25. If you don't mind, I would like to go back and continue with the first 25 issues, focusing on the reviews that I skipped initially, one issue at a time. So for starters, Skyrealms of Jorune had a review on issue #3 page 3 per RPGnet, so would you mind adding that one if you have that issue? If not, you have given an awesomely amazing amount of help on these over the last few years and I appreciate that for what it is. :) BOZ (talk) 14:00, 23 January 2024 (UTC)


 * No problem . Will just be slow--here and there. Airborne84 (talk) 01:15, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Cool, sounds good. :) Do you have issue #3? BOZ (talk) 07:06, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I do! Airborne84 (talk) 23:57, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you have issue #7? RPGnet shows that one reviewed King Arthur Pendragon on page 12, The Price of Freedom on page 16, and Psi World on page 19. BOZ (talk) 16:22, 25 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't have issue 6 or 7. Airborne84 (talk) 02:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * No worries. :) BOZ (talk) 03:47, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Do you have issue #8? RPGnet shows reviews for Hawkmoon and The Shattered Isle on page 56, Night of the Ninja on page 59, and TWERPS and Whimsy Cards on page 61. BOZ (talk) 14:48, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you as always. :) Just so you know, it looks like every issue from here out does contain reviews, so let me know if you are missing any from your collection and I will skip those. I have access to a handful of later issues in the 40s and 50s I think. A few issues are completely done already, so I will skip those as well as any individual reviews that have already been added. More later! BOZ (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Issue #9 has a bunch of reviews, so I will break them down bit by bit. First of all, Cyborg Commando on page 33, Top Secret/S.I. on page 34, and Warhammer Fantasy Roleplay on page 35. BOZ (talk) 15:02, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I don't have No. 9. I have issues 10-31 before my next break in issues. Airborne84 (talk) 23:17, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Oh, OK, no problem! I'll take a look and see what we need from #10 sometime next week. :) BOZ (talk) 23:21, 16 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Issue #10 had just a few reviews, Expendables (role-playing game) on page 27, Star Wars: The Roleplaying Game* on page 37, and 11 PBMs on page 53 if you have not already gone through those. :) BOZ (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2024 (UTC)

In appreciation

 * Thank you ! Greatly appreciate all your assistance on this article! Airborne84 (talk) 16:06, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
 * I will say that it has been enjoyable watching an editor go after a topic with a passion. :) BOZ (talk) 00:49, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the cheering on . And as I recall, you started that one! Airborne84 (talk) 03:33, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * By the way,, and , I'll nominate it for TFA in a few days after IRL settles down. Airborne84 (talk) 03:52, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Awesome, keep it rolling. :) Is there a date you can tie it to, or are you banking that the uniqueness of the topic will put it over the criteria for support on TFA? I got Planescape: Torment on TFA for its 20th anniversary, for example. :) BOZ (talk) 06:16, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
 * No date in mind. I could be wrong, but right now there are 11 requests for August 1–31, so unless a bunch of additional requests pour in during the next two weeks, they'll probably list some reruns in August. My guess is that as long as the blurb meets the standard, and it has enough support, it'll be OK, either in August or September. I could be wrong on that, of course. We'll see how it goes! Airborne84 (talk) 22:25, 12 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Well,, and . I listed it at WP:TFAR. We'll see how it goes! Airborne84 (talk) 01:18, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Looks like they have changed things since the long-ago last time I put something on the request page - you no longer have to aim for a specific day! You get extra points if you have an anniversary you can link it to. Cool, I will check in on that from time to time. BOZ (talk) 03:33, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Precious
You are recipient no. 2435 of Precious, a prize of QAI. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:45, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I'm honored. Thanks, and much appreciated! Airborne84 (talk) 10:00, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

After a favour …
Hi Airborne, how are you doing? Any more goodies coming down the road in terms of GANs or FACs now that you have set the precedent? More importantly how busy are you? And how generous are you feeling? Do you fancy reviewing one of my unloved GANs? Perhaps Battle of the Trebia? Although I admit that it is a biggy at a little over 5,000 words? Being serious, if time or motivation don't permit, I entirely understand. Thanks. Gog the Mild (talk) 22:11, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * @Gog the Mild, I should be able to in the next week or so. Things IRL are picking back up, so I won't be on Wikipedia much for a while, but I've been checking here and there recently. You pinged me at a good time! Airborne84 (talk) 16:56, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * My lucky day then. Thanks, appreciated. Someone has just picked up Battle of the Trebia, but Siege of Carthage (Third Punic War), Mathos and Punic Wars are available  Gog the Mild (talk) 10:48, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

Editor of the Week
User:Gog the Mild submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:
 * Airborne84 is a long time editor, typical of the backbone of Wikipedia. A contributor of broad interests: their two Featured Articles are Hyborian War - it features Conan, 'nuff said - and Sentence spacing! They are conscientious and thorough in their article creation; which largely consists of filling gaps in a much neglected area. Their approachability, helpfulness and civility are models of best practice. They seem to be in the midst of a surge of Wiki-activity and an EotW award would be a fitting way to recognise this.

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

Thanks again for your efforts! &#8213; Buster7  &#9742;   14:41, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Greatly appreciated and !! Airborne84 (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 05:02, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks @BOZ! Merry Christmas to you as well! Airborne84 (talk) 00:16, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

Barnstar for excellent edits

 * Thanks @Blue Pumpkin Pie! I appreciate it! --Airborne84 (talk) 00:19, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Awesome recognition for a hardworking editor. :) BOZ (talk) 10:09, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:45, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for remembering !

Drafts
Hey there! :) I have been building User:BOZ/Games deletions for the last few months, which does include a small section on deleted PBM articles. Looking over those, and all the redlinks above that I posted last year about articles I wanted to eventually start, I went ahead and started draft pages for a bunch of these - you know, in case you don't already have enough to work on. ;) They will be automatically deleted in 6 months if not edited by a human, but that is no big deal because they can always be restored; work on any of these that you feel like, and they can be moved (back) into article space whenever they are ready. :)


 * Draft:Button Men Web Game
 * Draft:Nuclear War (play-by-mail game)
 * Draft:Galaxy II
 * Draft:Blue Dwarf roleplaying game
 * Draft:Imperium (PBEM game)
 * Draft:Kings War

BOZ (talk) 01:44, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! I'll take a look over time and see what I can do. Happy editing! Airborne84 (talk) 12:38, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * If you can find something for even one or two of these like you did with Quest: World of Kharne, that would be awesome. :) BOZ (talk) 04:27, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I looked a while back and didn't find anything for these . I'll take a look again. Airborne84 (talk) 13:22, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Just keep these in mind, in case anything ever pops up for any of them. :) BOZ (talk) 12:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

I just want to say great work again on Lords of the Earth and the others I removed from this list. Keeping the rest in draft space for now is no problem, and who knows you may discover quality sources for some or all of them in the future and we can restore them as well. :) BOZ (talk) 22:54, 13 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks @BOZ. I'll keep my eyes open! Airborne84 (talk) 17:59, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Greetings Airborne84
Were you airborne in 1984? I was just leaving as the 1/509th ABCT was becoming 4/325. —¿philoserf? (talk) 15:05, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note . Great to meet you! No, 1984 was before my time. The "84" was just available. See you around! --Airborne84 (talk) 21:39, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Flying Buffalo
Check out the citations I made and let me know if it is kosher... Jokem (talk) 07:04, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 20:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks . Merry Christmas to you! Airborne84 (talk) 21:32, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:03, 19 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks ! Airborne84 (talk) 20:53, 19 August 2022 (UTC)

Quest PBM
Question, are Quest: World of Kharne and Quest (game) basically the same thing? I created the first one last year and you created the second one this year. If they're not the same game then there are a lot of coincidental similarities. :) If they are the same game, then they will need to be merged. Let me know what you think. BOZ (talk) 22:46, 15 December 2022 (UTC)


 * It must be @BOZ. I wonder if World of Kharne went with the US edition? I'll rummage around. I'm fine with merging. Which way would you like to do it? Airborne84 (talk) 01:51, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * On the one hand, my version (World of Kharne) came first. On the other hand your version is better written and got a DYK. I'm fine either way honestly, as long as we don't lose anything. Find out about the origin of the name and then we'll make a decision on which way to go. BOZ (talk) 05:33, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * They are the same @BOZ. Kharne is the setting for the game. I can't find any article or listing using "World of Kharne" other than the Origins Award website. My recommendation is to merge into Quest (game) and use the other name as one of the listed alternative names. I have some time later today or tomorrow and can do it. Airborne84 (talk) 22:45, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sweet, good work. :) I leave it in your capable hands, but I will follow up after you're done. :) BOZ (talk) 00:14, 17 December 2022 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!


BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 23:02, 22 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks @BOZ!! Same to you! Airborne84 (talk) 23:55, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Airborne84. Thank you for your work on Fleet Maneuvers. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   15:20, 12 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Airborne84. Thank you for your work on Out Time Days. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   16:15, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Airborne84. Thank you for your work on Renaissance (game). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   05:55, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Airborne84. Thank you for your work on The Weapon (game). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   05:53, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Airborne84. Thank you for your work on Aegyptus (game). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   12:57, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

see also possible issues
Hi Airborne,

just spotted this edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Middle-Earth_Play-By-Mail&diff=1138499258&oldid=1134919268

It seems like you ought to get a template which has the content of 'list of play-by-mail games' in it and paste that into the articles (at the end) instead of the edit you made (and it looks like it might be in a few laces and possibly want to be undone ?).

I think a link in the 'see also' section suggests there is something in those articles that mentions the page the 'see also' was on (or at least expands the content of the page in a way that is related to what the person looking at the article would find useful)

So a 'see also' for 'JRRTolkien' might be a suitable entry for Middle-Earth_Play-By-Mail (or the text could be blue linked if it already there) but if I follow one of the links to say hyborian war I don't see any mention of Middle-Earth_Play-By-Mail, nor anything that expands the readers knowledge of Middle-Earth_Play-By-Mail - obviously it shows another pbm game - but that's already in the 'list of play-by-mail games' and would be in the template.

hope that makes sense EdwardLane (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi . Thanks for the note. Frankly, this is the first effort I've taken to link play-by-mail (PBM) articles together in any meaningful way. So, I'm striking out in a new area to some degree.
 * The thread linking the articles together is that they are all fantasy wargame PBM games. I drew from the "Fantasy Wargames" category of awards published in Flagship magazine, so it comes from a PBM magazine source; it's not a self-generated list. If you think this isn't right, please advise. But I thought it would be useful for readers to see other games in the same PBM sub-genre (the "List of" article does not break out sub-genres). I had planned to do the same for science fiction PBM games, dueling PBM games, political PBM games, and crime PBM games, since Flagship uses those bins as well. Thoughts? Airborne84 (talk) 00:37, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I added short annotations to the See also links to identify their relevance. After rummaging around in the See also section, I saw it says "Editors should provide a brief annotation when a link's relevance is not immediately apparent". If you asked the question, others might as well. Thanks! Airborne84 (talk) 21:59, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm going to agree, a template seems like a good idea to replace the large "see also" sections. For an idea of how you could put one together, see Template:Avalon Hill which I created. BOZ (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * That seems like it would work better. Never put a template together, but that seems like the best way to go. Thanks! Airborne84 (talk) 01:26, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * With how many PBM articles there are now, it would be super helpful to have one. You can section them off between sci-fi against fantasy, or which ones are RPGs or wargames or whatever seems best. BOZ (talk) 01:47, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Done! Airborne84 (talk) 01:42, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

I think the template works really well, good job

Autopatrolled granted
Hi Airborne84, I just wanted to let you know that I have [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&page=User%3AAirborne84 added] the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! HJ Mitchell &#124; Penny for your thoughts? 14:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks . I will endeavor to live up to the standards. Much appreciated. Airborne84 (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2023 (UTC)
 * It's been well earned! Congrats. BOZ (talk) 01:21, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Legends (play-by-mail game)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Legends (play-by-mail game) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 19:43, 27 February 2023 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Mobius I (game)
Hello! Your submission of Mobius I (game) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know!  Naruto love hinata 5 (talk · contributions) 04:58, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infinite Conflict (March 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Infinite Conflict and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Infinite_Conflict Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CNMall41&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Infinite_Conflict reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 08:40, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Infinite Conflict has been accepted
 Infinite Conflict, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Infinite_Conflict help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Galobtter (pingó mió) 10:03, 10 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Legends (play-by-mail game)
The article Legends (play-by-mail game) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Legends (play-by-mail game) and Talk:Legends (play-by-mail game)/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 22:21, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Legends (play-by-mail game)
The article Legends (play-by-mail game) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Legends (play-by-mail game) for comments about the article, and Talk:Legends (play-by-mail game)/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Lee Vilenski -- Lee Vilenski (talk) 15:21, 16 March 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Mobius I
-- RoySmith (talk) 12:03, 19 March 2023 (UTC)


 * Congrats! :) BOZ (talk) 13:25, 19 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lords of the Earth
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lords of the Earth you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 10:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lords of the Earth
The article Lords of the Earth you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lords of the Earth and Talk:Lords of the Earth/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 20:43, 2 April 2023 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lords of the Earth
The article Lords of the Earth you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Lords of the Earth for comments about the article, and Talk:Lords of the Earth/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Harrias -- Harrias (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Lords of the Earth
Aoidh (talk) 00:03, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of the Nuts and Bolts of Gaming magazine, 1984 with cover art by Larry Brenza.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of the Nuts and Bolts of Gaming magazine, 1984 with cover art by Larry Brenza.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:06, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tactical Assault Group (game) (May 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Zxcvbnm was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Tactical_Assault_Group_(game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zxcvbnm&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tactical_Assault_Group_(game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:16, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of the Gods (play-by-mail game) has been accepted
 Battle of the Gods (play-by-mail game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Battle_of_the_Gods_(play-by-mail_game) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! – bradv  05:14, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Play-by-mail games2
Template:Play-by-mail games2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 12:49, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:51, 19 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you @Gerda Arendt!! I appreciate your work on this to recognize editors Airborne84 (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

DYK for Blood Pit
—Kusma (talk) 16:51, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Cover of out-of-print magazine Paper Mayhem, Issue 31, July-August 1988.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Cover of out-of-print magazine Paper Mayhem, Issue 31, July-August 1988.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:12, 23 September 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game)
Hello, Airborne84. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tactical Assault Group (game) (November 4)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SunDawn was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Tactical_Assault_Group_(game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:SunDawn&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tactical_Assault_Group_(game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

&maltese; SunDawn &maltese;   (contact)   01:26, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tactical Assault Group (game) (November 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rich Smith was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tactical Assault Group (game) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Tactical_Assault_Group_(game) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rich_Smith&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Tactical_Assault_Group_(game) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 02:12, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tactical Assault Group (game) has been accepted
 Tactical Assault Group (game), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Tactical_Assault_Group_(game) help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Utopes (talk / cont) 18:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Success finally achieved. :) BOZ (talk) 20:37, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Indeed! :) Airborne84 (talk) 00:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Glad to see you back at it, by the way? :) BOZ (talk) 14:50, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Not really . I had some time. But I'll be in and out--mostly out. Happy editing! Airborne84 (talk) 01:42, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Hey, partly in is better than completely out. :) See you from time to time! BOZ (talk) 01:44, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">

BOZ (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Don't eat yellow snow!

Spread the holiday cheer by adding to their talk page with a friendly message.

I'm wishing you a Merry Christmas, because that is what I celebrate. Feel free to take a "Happy Holidays" or "Season's Greetings" if you prefer. :) BOZ (talk) 00:14, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks ! And Merry Christmas to you! Airborne84 (talk) 00:50, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

The Orion nebula
Hello. TON was designed as an open ended game. The intent was to computerize the moderation of PBM. The plan was to then grow it to play by computer with each turn run weekly with graphics. The article was fun to read. Glad to talk if you have interest. John McGee. SapioMaster (talk) 16:06, 31 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks John! I fixed the article which was correct in the main body but said closed-ended in the lead. Lots of room for improvement in the article. Feel free to improve it if you'd like! Airborne84 (talk) 22:24, 31 December 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13
An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Westworld (game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American Indian.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Westworld (game)
Hello! Your submission of Westworld (game) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PCN02WPS ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 00:50, 15 January 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Screenshot of Bard&#39;s Tale III gameplay in wilderness setting.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Screenshot of Bard&. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

DYK for Westworld (game)
Z1720 (talk) 00:02, 27 January 2024 (UTC)