User talk:Airview95

Further:To add a WP:RS citation just insert a (direct) reference right after your edit like this:. Unsourced edits might (and usually are and will be) reversed without further comment. Regards, --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 01:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Again and still: "Popular vote winner in bold?"
Since you commented before or are otherwise involved, please take a look at Template talk:Infobox Election, .--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 04:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism of United States presidential election, 1960 article
Harry Byrd was not a candidate for president in 1960 the votes you keep adding were from 1956 (READ HIS ARTICLE), he did however receive electoral votes. It is clear you feel he belongs in the info box but many others disagree, bring your views to the talk page to discuss it. As for your putting info in bold the current consensus is to only put the electoral vote winner in bold. A link to this discussion is already on your talk page.

If your blatant vandalism continues you will eventually be blocked.

=
=======Stop messing with others hard work!!!!!!==================

May 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 04:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

You should discuss controversial edits at the articles talk page and/or at the page pointed out to you.--The Magnificent Clean-keeper (talk) 04:55, 2 May 2009 (UTC)

Temper tantrum Vandalism of United States presidential election, 1960 article
You have been asked repeatedly by several editors to make your case on the talk page for inclusion of Harry F. Bryd, (in the info box) first rather then just doing it. Obviously you do not have any good rationalization for your edits otherwise you would have discussed it by now. Since you can not make an argument for inclusion, you need to stop behaving like a child and cease your additions of vandalism, otherwise you will have to be banned from editing. Your temper tantrum over this article demonstrates that you are not mature enough to use Wikipedia, and all of your edits are suspect and should deleted on sight.

If you insist on continuing to use Wikipedia, you should check out the following articles which cover topics you must not have learned in kindergarten. Sharing, Consensus, Group Work, and Collaboration.

If this does not help I suggest starting you own wiki website, because your not wanted here! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.114.182.211 (talk) 18:28, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Image changing
Please stop changing images discussion. The current standard is that official photos are preferred. OhNo itsJamie Talk 20:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)