User talk:Airwolf754

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -MBK004 23:45, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Airwolf754! I have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on or by typing helpme at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or place helpme on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Patman21 (talk) 00:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image source problem with Image:Ec-waterblob.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Ec-waterblob.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Images are of our own property i've put the public domain release noticed since the upload Airwolf754 (talk) 12:42, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I have tagged this image as of dubious copyright. You are claiming that you were literally on the plane and took the picture - and that it was not a work produced for the company involved but a personal snapshot (otherwise, the company/agency would own the copyright). Unless you are claiming that you represent the EXA. If either of these are true, you will probably have to clear the images through the OTRS system: see Requesting copyright permission. Rmhermen (talk) 13:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, how you do that?. And by the way, i DO represent EXA AND the Ecuadorian Air Force Airwolf754 (talk) 13:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * I suspected as much which is why I mentioned it. First you need to be aware of, and follow, our conflict of interest policy. Note that we encourage even people with a conflict of interest to submit images. For the images, you need to be certain that you have control over the images - if they are personal snapshots, be certain the company/agency doesn't have rights to work produced during working hours, or if they are agency photographs that you have authority to release them and to license them under one of our licences. Requesting copyright permission is a good summary of the text suggested and briefly explains how the images could be used. If you are in legal control of the images, you could email me with that text (including your signature and the file as an attachment) and I could submit it through the permissions system. Also I would not suggest using the public domain license myself. The GFDL license (our default) or the CC-by licenses (considered by some better for images) require that any other user acknowledge you as the source and creator of the image. Rmhermen (talk) 13:56, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

And what is your AUTHORITY for that? We are official entities of the Ecuadorian government, and for that i need to know who are you and who do you represent for that you need to submit form code GRE-PID-8756-004 by fax, signed with a copy of a valid ID proof to the number +593-42-835740 clearing that you officially represent Wikipedia.org site Airwolf754 (talk) 14:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You are free to submit the information to the OTRS system yourself. I was only trying to be helpful. However note that you have uploaded two images which may soon be deleted from our site for unclear copyright status. You have taken to images which may be copyright of the Ecuadorian government and released them for free use for any purpose by anyone anywhere for ever. Do you have that authority? Or are the images you personal property? We cannot host illegal images on this site and therefore we need to take certain steps to protect our project as well as to respect other's rights. There may be no problem here at all. All I am asking is for you to confirm that. Rmhermen (talk) 19:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I Am in representation of EXA, i only wanted to contribute, and as for the image of the kid flying with the flag, it is a PUBLIC image we released to Associated Press the day of the record, you can find it anywhere as the picture appeared in more than 7000 media around the world, just Google the name Jules Nader and you will see the same picture over and over again, or you can go to EXA's website http://exa.ec/indnews and see the collection of some of the articles. just a few follow: http://www.worldrecordsacademy.org/amazing/youngest_passenger_on_wheightless_flight-world_record_set_by_Jules_Nader_80264.htm http://www.exa.ec/indnews/poseidon/bbc-2.jpg http://www.exa.ec/indnews/poseidon/AP.jpg http://www.exa.ec/indnews/poseidon/wpost.jpg http://www.exa.ec/indnews/poseidon/mherald.jpg http://www.exa.ec/indnews/poseidon/nypost.jpg http://www.exa.ec/indnews/poseidon/bostonglobe.jpg http://www.exa.ec/indnews/poseidon/lenquirer.jpg

As for the other picture, again only wanted to contribute, EXA follows a media policy similar to NASA's, unless specified all published material is public domain.

Deleted them if you want, we don't lose anything, wikipedia loses, not us. Airwolf754 (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. If you can point me to a copyright statement on the EXA website, we would be able to use these and more. Just because a image is widely used on the internet; however, doesn't make it free. I hope you can understand our need to not violate others' rights. Rmhermen (talk) 23:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

EXA
As you there, perhaps you would clear up some questions about the EXA to improve the article? *Is this a civilian governmental agency? Or a public-private partnership? Is it fully publicly funded? The few online sources I find are unclear to me. "EXA, una corporación sin fines de lucro" does not sound like a government agency. Rmhermen (talk) 20:02, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Are its employees all also Ecuadorian Air Force members? Or some? Or none?
 * What is the relationship of Space Adventures to the EXA? Is EXA developing any spacecraft?

EXA structure is similar to the Russia's RossKosmos, a civilian institution, mixed funded, under Ecuadorian law it is called a mix capital non-profit organization, it is 50% civilian and 50% Ecuadorian government through Ecuadorian Air Force.

Space Adventures is a provider for EXA and FAE, actually is providing services to retrofit our next 0G plane, a FAE Boeing 727-100 as Space Adventures own Zero-G corporation.

As for EXA developing an spacecraft, that's beyond my security clearance and well above my pay grade.

Airwolf754 (talk) 21:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will try to work some of this into the article. Rmhermen (talk) 23:39, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Dispute resolution and more
WP:Dispute resolution should give you some links. According to some of your edits you seem to be affiliated with an agency related to the Nader, so I'd advise you to study our conflict of interest guideline in case it applies to your status as editor. If vice-versa any external organization see the need to contact Wikipdia, this should be done via the OTRS system. Oh, staying clam and civil and assuming good faith is always a prime concern here. --Tikiwont (talk) 15:34, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 14:41, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Spaceflight portals
Hello! As an member editor of one or more of the Spaceflight, Human spaceflight, Unmanned spaceflight, Timeline of spaceflight or Space colonisation WikiProjects, I'd like to draw to your attention a proposal I have made with regards to the future of the spaceflight-related portals, which can be found at Portal talk:Spaceflight. I'd very much appreciate any suggestions or feedback you'd be able to offer! Many thanks,

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Human spaceflight at 08:37, 9 November 2010 (UTC).

WikiProject Spaceflight activity
Hello there! As part of an effort to determine how many active editors are present in the spaceflight-related WikiProjects, changes have been made to the list of members of WikiProject Spaceflight. If you still consider yourself to be an active editor in this project, it would be appreciated if you would please edit the list so that your name is not struck out - thus a clearer idea of the number of active editors can be determined. Many thanks in advance!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 17:56, 3 December 2010 (UTC).

WikiProject Spaceflight reboot
Hello there! As you may or may not be aware, a recent discussion on the future of the Space-related WikiProjects has concluded, leading to the abolition of WP:SPACE and leading to a major reorganisation of WP:SPACEFLIGHT. It would be much appreciated if you would like to participate in the various ongoing discussions at the reorganisation page and the WikiProject Spaceflight talk page. If you are a member of one of WP:SPACEFLIGHT's child projects but not WP:SPACEFLIGHT itself, it would also be very useful if you could please add your name to the member list here. Many thanks!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 0

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 16:02, 16 December 2010 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 1

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 14:50, 1 January 2011 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 2

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Spaceflight at 00:25, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

The Downlink: Issue 3

 * You have recieved this newsletter because you are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Spaceflight, or because you are not a member but have requested it. If you do not wish to receive future issues, please add your name to the opt-out list.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Spaceflight at 09:13, 3 March 2011 (UTC).

File permission problem with File:NEE-01-PEGASO.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:NEE-01-PEGASO.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Hammersoft (talk) 20:59, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:FOTO-OFICIAL-RNB-SN.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:FOTO-OFICIAL-RNB-SN.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 72.88.49.68 (talk) 23:12, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ✅ Morgan Kevin J (talk) 06:00, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Ec-waterblob.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ec-waterblob.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:00, 20 April 2012 (UTC)