User talk:Aj30003000

Welcome!
Hello, Aj30003000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pocket Aces Pictures Private Limited (Company), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- &#x03C6; OnePt618Talk &#x03C6;  04:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Pocket Aces Pictures Private Limited (Company)


A tag has been placed on Pocket Aces Pictures Private Limited (Company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. -- &#x03C6; OnePt618Talk &#x03C6;  04:58, 9 February 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sean Byrnes


The article Sean Byrnes has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not meet notability criteria. Sources given are either about the companies or they are articles or podcasts by him."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... disco spinster   talk  19:23, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Paid editing disclosure
Hello Aj30003000. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Aj30003000. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. ... disco spinster   talk  19:31, 20 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Hello disco spinster   talk, I have not been paid nor am I expecting any kind of payment in the future. Sean is a relative of a close friend of mine. I got his request from that friend.
 * Also I would like to point that, his career has been provided in the notable publication like techcrunch and venturebeat. He does not have enough to talk about, which is why only important information has been given in the article. I would request you for helping me improve the article.Aj30003000 (talk) 01:41, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Sean Byrnes for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sean Byrnes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sean Byrnes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... disco spinster   talk  15:24, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of ZunRoof for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ZunRoof is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/ZunRoof until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 17:19, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with ZunRoof. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—cyberbot I  Talk to my owner :Online 05:53, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Moving drafts to mainspace
Please do not move draft articles to mainspace – such articles should be reviewed for possible issues. Since Draft:Fynd had several issues making the draft unsuitable for mainspace at this time, it should not have been moved. An additional issue is the fact that the Wikipedia editing community determined a couple of years ago that the company does not meet the notability requirements, and that makes it even more important that an editor with experience of determining notability reviews the article. (If it had remained in mainspace it would certainly have been nominated for deletion again.) --bonadea contributions talk 18:38, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

improper request

 * You apparently do not understand what the purpose iof Wikipedia is. It is not for advertising, or publishing pages about one;'s friend's enterprises. The people who write here work as volunteers, including the administrators such as myself. One of the most foolish things you could do here is exactly what  you have just done, offered to pay an administrator here for help in keeping an article.  DGG ( talk ) 02:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  DGG ( talk ) 02:02, 24 March 2020 (UTC)