User talk:Ajadams94

Welcome to Wikipedia from Jalexander
Hi, Ajadams94! I want to welcome you to Wikipedia and thank you for your edit! I hope you like editing here and being part of Wikipedia and that we will see you around for a long time to come. When you leave messages on Discussion pages (like this one, or the article discussion pages) you want to try and remember to sign your name using four tildes (~&#126;); when you save the page, this will turn into your name and the date. If you need help, check out the Wikipedia Cheatsheet, Questions or of course feel free to ask me on my discussion page. If you put  (and a note about what you need help with), someone will come by shortly to answer your question. Again, welcome to Wikipedia! Jalexander--WMF 21:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your school article at Kincardine District Secondary School. It's great to get more set up. If you need any help or have any questions please feel free to let me know, it would be great if we could get some Reliable sources for the information on the page (usually thinks like newspapers, books, tv channels or magazines) and I'd be happy to help out with that. Again welcome to Wikipedia! Jalexander--WMF 21:41, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Team 781


A tag has been placed on Team 781 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ... disco spinster   talk  21:51, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Barkey Family


A tag has been placed on Barkey Family requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Barkey


The article Daniel Barkey has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Requires citations from reliable sources to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:30, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Freeman Burley


The article Freeman Burley has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced. Requires reliable sources to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Abraham Stouffer


The article Abraham Stouffer has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced. Requires reliable sources to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:32, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Freeman Burley for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Freeman Burley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Freeman Burley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:39, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Daniel Barkey for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniel Barkey is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Daniel Barkey until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:56, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Abraham Stouffer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Abraham Stouffer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Abraham Stouffer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 20:59, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Abraham Stouffer. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:31, 29 May 2011 (UTC)


 * The best way of avoiding deletion is simply to find reliable sources to establish notability. Sergeant Cribb (talk) 21:34, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Freeman Burley. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. ConcernedVancouverite (talk) 21:43, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Alexander Mackenzie (utility tycoon)"
A page you created, Alexander Mackenzie (utility tycoon), has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a blatant copyright infringement.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Meph talk 03:41, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Allan Cameron and William Withers


The article Allan Cameron and William Withers has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Calabe1992 (talk) 03:01, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Frank Barkey with this edit. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Monty 845  21:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Garrett Meurs


The article Garrett Meurs has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. joe deckertalk to me 16:11, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Coombe Furniture Factory Company Limited


A tag has been placed on Coombe Furniture Factory Company Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:14, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Thank you for your recent contributions, such as Coombe Furniture Factory Company Limited. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:36, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Coombe Furniture Factory Company Limited
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Coombe Furniture Factory Company Limited, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 03:42, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Paddy Walker House
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Paddy Walker House, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.walkerhousekincardine.com.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:43, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Ajadams94, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Ajadams94/Municipality of Kincardine. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:00, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kincardine Beach Pavilion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kincardine Beach Pavilion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kincardine Beach Pavilion until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mohamed Aden Ighe (talk) 04:56, 23 August 2011 (UTC)


 * The AfD debate has been extended by a few days. If you want to save this article, I suggest you do some work to improve it.  Show it some love.   PK  T (alk)  10:38, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of South Bruce Grey Health Centre


The article South Bruce Grey Health Centre has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable health care facility. No attempt has been made to demonstrate notability or identify the source of any of the information. After less than a month development of this page has been abandoned.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dolphin ( t ) 12:27, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Bluewater Athletic Association


A tag has been placed on Bluewater Athletic Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 00:26, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Cwossa.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Cwossa.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 00:56, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Municipality of Kincardine
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Municipality of Kincardine, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.wordiq.com/definition/Kincardine%2C_Ontario.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:16, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Cwossa.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Cwossa.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Kincardine
Please note that per Wikipedia's rules, the municipality always gets title precedence, because it's the primary incorporated entity. The individual community of the same name that is inside the larger municipality is allowed a separate article only if you can add reliable sources which are specifically about it separately from the rest of the municipality, which none of the ones that you retained were. For instance, you did not provide any legitimate source for the community of Kincardine having a population of 6,000; you simply hung onto the municipal population reference even though it failed to support your claimed number in any way. Wikipedia does not allow unsourced population estimates, and you are not allowed to claim or assert any population figure that is not taken exactly from the last official release of Statistics Canada census data — you must provide an exact Statistics Canada population figure or no population figure at all.

Without proper sources that are specifically about Kincardine-the-community itself, it is only allowed to be a redirect to the larger municipality and is not allowed to have its own separate article — and even if you can add proper sources, the municipality gets the title "Kincardine, Ontario" and the community gets a subordinate title such as "Kincardine, Ontario (community)". Under no circumstances does the actual incorporated municipal entity ever go at an alternate title like "Municipality of X" instead of just "X"; if there's a naming conflict, the municipality gets the primary title and the smaller community gets the disambiguated one.

Just to be clear, you are allowed to write separate articles about the individual communities within the municipality, if proper sourcing is available. But if you can write and source a proper article about the community of Kincardine, then it goes at a new, separate subtitle and does not get to replace the municipality as the topic of the existing title. Municipalities on Wikipedia go at their short form names (either "Name" or "Name, Ontario") with no exceptions; if there's a smaller community within the municipality that has the same name, it gets a disambiguated subtitle such as "Name, Ontario (community)" or "Name, Ontario (neighbourhood)". Bearcat (talk) 21:57, 8 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I'd recommend that if you do want to write a separate article about the community, you work on it in your own userspace (e.g. at User:Ajadams94/Sandbox.) Then, when it is ready to go live, you can copy and paste it into Kincardine, Ontario (community). But the existing article must remain about the municipality as a whole, with the community's separate article as a supplement; the community does not get to replace the municipality as the main topic. Hope that helps. Bearcat (talk) 22:55, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Penetangore Regional Economic Development Corporation
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Penetangore Regional Economic Development Corporation, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://predc.net/aboutus.php?pgid=2.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 21:36, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Penetangore Regional Economic Development Corporation


A tag has been placed on Penetangore Regional Economic Development Corporation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar  22:10, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Penetangore Regional Economic Development Corporation, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Alles Klar, Herr Kommisar  22:26, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Municipality of Kincardine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Johnny Wilson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:51, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Kincardine
For the record, this is not the first time I've pointed this out to you: you may not rewrite Kincardine, Ontario to be about the village instead of the incorporated municipality that it's a part of; per Wikipedia's naming conventions, the municipality gets the Kincardine, Ontario title. If you can write a properly referenced article about the village, you may do so at Kincardine (community) or another similar title — but it is a subordinate entity to the municipality, and does not get to replace the municipality as the primary topic.

Please note, as well, that you can be editblocked if you don't start following Wikipedia's rules. Bearcat (talk) 01:15, 21 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Firstly, no, Toronto is not in York Region. Toronto is adjacent to York Region, but is not part of it. And the comparison between a community being inside a municipality and a municipality being inside a county is a false and irrelevant one anyway, because they aren't the same situation at all.
 * Secondly, I did not say that the community cannot have an article; I said that it cannot have an unreferenced article. If you can add proper reliable sources about the community as a separate topic in its own right, then it can certainly have its own separate article — but just like any other topic on Wikipedia, it is not allowed to have an article that does not cite legitimate sources. And whether it has its own separate article or not, you are not allowed to hijack an existing article either — you need to create a new one at the title I indicate below, and may not simply replace the current article.
 * Thirdly, Wikipedia has naming conventions which must be followed — namely, there are exactly no circumstances under which any municipality in Canada may ever be shunted off to a "Town of...", "City of..." or "Municipality of..." title. Rather, a municipality goes at "Place" or "Place, Province" with no exceptions. If there's a smaller community within that municipality in conflict for the same "Place, Province" name, then the municipality still gets precedence for the "Place, Province" title, because it is larger, incorporated and has a municipal government and statistical census data published by Statistics Canada, and is thus the more important entity. A community can have "Place, Province" if its name is unique — but if its name conflicts with another thing, the more important thing gets the plain name and the less important one gets a disambiguated title. Accordingly, the municipality gets Kincardine, Ontario and the community within it gets Kincardine, Ontario (community) or another title which is disambiguated to make clear that it is subordinate to the municipality. That's the rules on here, and there will be no further discussion on that point — our naming conventions are organized around the principle of consistency from one article to the next, not the principle of "one guy says this title should mean that other thing instead of this one". Bearcat (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Town of Kincardine
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Town of Kincardine, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://krassoc.wordpress.com/2013/06/10/kincardine-methodist-church-bruce-county/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 22:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Danie Cortese Entertainment


A tag has been placed on Danie Cortese Entertainment, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Fiddle  Faddle  07:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Allan Thompson (Canadian)


A tag has been placed on Allan Thompson (Canadian) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. SamHolt6 (talk) 01:14, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Allan Thompson (Canadian) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Allan Thompson (Canadian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Allan Thompson (Canadian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 15:11, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 7ACRES


The article 7ACRES has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not a notable company per WP:AUD. Only independent coverage is in the local Kincardine News."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 20:19, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Madison House (Kincardine, Ontario) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madison House (Kincardine, Ontario) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Madison House (Kincardine, Ontario) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Ontario Centres for Learning, Research and Innovation in Long-Term Care


A tag has been placed on Ontario Centres for Learning, Research and Innovation in Long-Term Care, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://clri-ltc.ca/about-clri/. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Tracy Von Doom (talk) 15:22, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Duhin Nanda


A tag has been placed on Duhin Nanda requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. - Nahal (T) 22:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Duhin Nanda for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Duhin Nanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Duhin Nanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 22:40, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Thai Nguyen (Fashion Designer)


A tag has been placed on Thai Nguyen (Fashion Designer), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of https://www.express.co.uk/showbiz/tv-radio/1304138/say-i-do-cast-who-is-thai-nguyen-celebrity-fashion-designer-netflix. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa (talk) 16:10, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

sourcing
Do not re-add content to BLPs that has been challenged and please read WP:RS. Cheatsheet is not a reliable source and cannot be used. Praxidicae (talk) 17:53, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon Barinholtz


The article Jon Barinholtz has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The subject fails both WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR - all 3 criteria."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Less Unless (talk) 19:13, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon Barinholtz


The article Jon Barinholtz has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. BostonMensa (talk) 14:55, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

Jon Barinholtz moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Jon Barinholtz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 03:27, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Carson Tueller


A tag has been placed on Carson Tueller requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Velella  Velella Talk 21:50, 11 October 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Christian Stauffer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christian Stauffer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Christian Stauffer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 18:58, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Jon Barinholtz


Hello, Ajadams94. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jon Barinholtz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:51, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Davidson Centre for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davidson Centre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Davidson Centre until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)