User talk:Ajaystarrer

October 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 13:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

February 2016
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sonam Kapoor. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. ''Diffs: Your "affectionate" write-up of Sonam Kapoor is not appropriate tone for an encyclopedia. We're not here to write puff-pieces for people. Wikipedia strives to be an honest academic reference, and content must be written from a neutral point of view and in a professional tone befitting an encyclopedia. Content about how Kapoor isn't afraid to express her honest opinion in public is absurd for an article's lead, as is non-neutral language like "flop" and "highly acclaimed". You should familiarize yourself with some featured articles and maybe WP:YFA before writing more content.'' Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:41, 24 February 2016 (UTC)

March 2016
Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Bipasha Basu, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:15, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Sonam Kapoor
Hi, I understand your enthusiasm about the article, but please refrain from adding those tedious texts which resemble a lot of other articles of Indian actresses. You see, this is an FA-class biography that means that it is one of the best articles in Wikipedia, but that way it cannot be considered an excellent article. FrB.TG (talk) 17:50, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

November 2016
Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Raveena Tandon. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2016 (UTC) You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:17, 8 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Ajaystarrer, re: this, there was a very obvious embedded note in the birth_date parameter instructing you to provide a reference. There's no excuse for you not providing a reference. If you treat articles this casually after your block expires, future blocks will be longer. You're not helping to make the encyclopedia stronger by adding unsourced or improperly sourced content. And once again, your commentary about a person's outspoken personality has no place in articles. You were told about this in early 2016. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:53, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

December 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for disruptive editing including repeated removal of needed templates. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  13:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)