User talk:Ajcalifornia

April 2024
Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... disco spinster   talk  06:21, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Pink Friday 2. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  Maxwell King 123321 23:13, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

June 2024
Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Nicki Minaj, you may be blocked from editing. Thedarkknightli (talk) 06:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I adequately explained why I removed what I removed, whether you agree with it or not, and you can look at my edit history. The language is biased and has been added on purpose to sway the reader in a certain way and sway their opinion on the artist. In case you did not know, this is against Wiki guidelines: Neutral point of view
 * "All encyclopedic content on Wikipedia must be written from a neutral point of view (NPOV), which means representing fairly, proportionately, and, as far as possible, without editorial bias, all the significant views that have been published by reliable sources on a topic."
 * You can keep reverting my edits all you want, I will revert them back to match the above standards and I have absolutely no problems raising this issue to get this resolved. Ajcalifornia (talk) 09:39, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nicki Minaj. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Thedarkknightli (talk) 11:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Nicki Minaj. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. —Smalljim 12:17, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:18, 6 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Nicki Minaj, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Karst (talk) 07:37, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Jauerbackdude?/dude. 12:40, 19 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Ajcalifornia (talk) 06:13, 1 July 2024 (UTC)
 * The block is no longer necessary because I understand what I was blocked for, I will not do it again without discussions first, and I will CONTINUE to make productive contributions instead.
 * In my defense, the edits I had made were not malicious in nature or intent, they were my POV on a matter which seemed to be against what other editors thought. My edits were always meaningful, nonbiased, and non-malicious. Ajcalifornia (talk) 06:16, 1 July 2024 (UTC)