User talk:Ajcutts1992

May 2019
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Leona Lewis. Thank you. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 04:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Leona Lewis, you may be blocked from editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 20:00, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

I am emailing/ messaging regarding my editing on Leona Lewis' profile. I have changed the information regarding the Ivor Novello award, to the single, instead of stating Leona herself won. This was written after finding sources listing Leona Lewis A Moment Like This as the winner. It did not specify the writers name within the sources, only Leona Lewis. (The sources used were from the Ivors Offical page and the BBC, an article declaring the winners from 2007).

I apologise if I cited information incorrectly- I am new to Wikipedia, thus I am still learning how to use the editing processes.

Regards Ajcutts1992 (talk) 23:32, 26 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Ok. I’ve struck my warning as it was perhaps too harsh. The Ivor Novello Awards are for songwriting and composing, and the Ivors Official Page that you cited at List of Ivor Novello Award winners does list all the songwriters for each nomination (under "A Moment Like This", it says "Written by: Jorgen Elofsson and John Reid"). The BBC source was just listing the songs that won (along with their performer), instead of every individual who actually won. Bennv3771 (talk) 01:22, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I've un-struck my warning since you've persisted in carrying on your disruptive editing. Bennv3771 (talk) 01:32, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Continuation message
Dear editor,

In regards to your comments- I declare that I stated explicitly that I had changed my editing to include that the single, A Moment Like This (2007), won an Ivor Novello award in 2007. This is factual information, and again was supported with reputable and robust citation from the Ivors archived page and the BBC. I did not state that Leona Lewis was the named winner of the award. I certainly did not continue to publish unfactual, disruptive information through editing processes.

As stated previously, I am new member to Wikipedia- I am simply trying to update and improve the Leona Lewis page. Therefore, I seek clarification as to why my last edit, which was truthful and cited, was deemed destruptive, and was consequently deleted on the Leona Lewis page? As the information was truthful and cited appropriately, I struggle to understand how this is deemed destruptive editing?

Any guidance to support my understanding of citation and editing would be appreciated to improve my performance and to eliminate such warnings/ comments in the future.

Regards Ajcutts1992 (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * As my original warning stated, when your edits are reverted, Wikipedia expects editors to discuss and gain consensus instead of repeatedly re-inserting the disputed content. Edit warring is considered disruptive. Yes, in the most recent edit, you did re-word the content so it is factually accurate, and hence I have left it alone. But I do ask you to consider if highlighting an award that someone else won is really necessary in the lead of Leona Lewis' article. Per WP:LEAD, the lead of a Wikipedia article is meant to summarize the most significant contents of the article. I do not see why an award that someone else won is a significant enough aspect of Leona Lewis' life that it needs to be mentioned in the lead of her article. It comes across as puffery. Bennv3771 (talk) 01:14, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Please read WP:USCHARTS
We do not add download and streaming charts when a song already charted on the main chart of a country, as "Higher Love" did in the UK and US. Thanks.  Ss  112   04:43, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Higher Love
Thank you for your message. I was not aware of this information. Thank you for sending the US charts information. Please could you send the information for the UK charts which states UK download should not be used if a song as charted on the official singles chart.

Regards Ajcutts1992 (talk) 13:16, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
 * It's what WP:CHARTMATH talks about. WP:CHARTMATH just gives an example of the US charts—as downloads contribute to a song's placement on the overall UK Singles Chart, we do not include the UK Download unless the song did not chart on the UK Singles Chart. This is convention.  Ss  112   13:30, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)