User talk:Ajgorhoe

Please insert your posts at the bottom of this page.

Thank you,

Ajgorhoe (talk)

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. I've moved Črneče to Crnece, since the C with the accent didn't render correctly. Maximus Rex 01:40, 25 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Thanks for all your contributions. Please note that you should not sign articles. Your user name is displayed in the page history, so you should not add it to the article itself.

If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. If you made any edits before you got an account, you might be interested in assigning those to your username. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

Angela. 07:36, Feb 25, 2004 (UTC)

Ajgorhoe, what to say for your award of barnstar to my contributions herein. Well I'll just say thank you of course, but this also means some more obligations to me for my further work. I also have to say that I am very glad because of your recent contributions, specially for the Carinthia region. Let us keep on good work and God speed us. Best regards. (Lep pozdrav) --XJamRastafire 03:11, 16 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Request for edit summary
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you. – Oleg Alexandrov (talk) 02:27, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Numerical simulation
I have added a "" template to the article Numerical simulation, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Felis Leo Talk! 12:42, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

Numerical Simulation (again)
I proposed deletion on the article because in the form it was in it was no more than a dictionary entry, see WP:DICDEF. Unfortunately you weren't around to either expand or contest the delete so I think you will have a good shot at getting it restored. You can request a deletion review here: WP:DRV Cheers,  Felis Leo Talk! 10:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

hey plese
you can traslate to slovene this

--Zerolex 18:44, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * This user does not understand slovene (or understands it with considerable difficulty).
 * These users speak Slovene.

Translations are:
 * Ta uporabnik ne razume (ali precej slabo razume) slovensko
 * Ti uporabniki govorijo Slovensko.

A tag has been placed on Doodle event scheduling, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Corvus cornix 22:12, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * In light of the above concerns and after considering your comments on the talk page, I have deleted this article. Feel free to recreate it if you can prove that the subject meets our notability guidelines.  Thanks for understanding. Canderson7 (talk) 22:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Dear Canderson7, you have deleted the article Doodle event scheduling although: Now the article including the arguments on its discussion page is lost. In order to restore the article, I must restart everything from scratch (I didn't save my work on my computer). In my opinion, such actions do not help extending and improving Wikipedia. Ajgorhoe 23:59, 8 July 2007 (UTC)
 * the article did not match (in my opinion) any criteria for speedy deletion
 * I have contested the deletion (inserted the hangon template) and inserted arguments about why I disprove deletion on article's discussion page
 * Nobody has stated any counterargument
 * I have promised on article's discussion page that I will soon improve the article in such a way that the notability of its subject can be asserted


 * Hi Ajgorhoe,


 * Sorry that you didn't find my previous statement suitably clear. As User:Corvus cornix first pointed out, the article qualified for deletion as "unremarkable web content" under CSD A7.  The hangon tag exists so that you can postpone deletion while you formulate and post your argument against deletion.  You did so in the ample time provided and posted it to the talk page.

This article is about a web page that provides a free internet service that enables people to synchronize time of a planned event (such as a project meeting) according to the schedules of all participants. This is a very useful tool for schedule planning that helps to solve the major problem of this activity in the case when there are a larger number of potential participants or when participants are located at distant locations, such that it would be difficult for them to meet separately to establish the date.

I don't have information about how wide spread the use of the service is, but experience from my business environment (I work on many R&D international projects) is that all people who have found out about the service also started to use it for scheduling meetings.

In the near future (which according to my busy schedule means a couple of days, not a couple of minutes) I plan to extend the article in such a way that notability will be more easily recognizable. Ajgorhoe 22:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)


 * User:SGGH posted a counter-argument:

"Asserting notability is just as important when beating a speedy delete. You say that you don't have the information but it is notable and well used, but without facts and figures to back that up the article will still be deleted. I suggest you wait until you have citations to back it up and then recreate the article. SGGH speak! 22:44, 8 July 2007 (UTC)"


 * I came along after finding the article in CAT:CSD. I evaluated the CSD, your argument, and the counter-argument.  As creator of an article, the burden lies with you to (at the very least) allege notability for the subject.  You had not done so.  In light of this fact and Wikipedia policy, I decided to delete the article, knowing that it could be recreated along with an assertion of notability at any time in the future.  The full deleted content is quoted below for your convenience.

'' Doodle event scheduling is a free web-based tool to find suitable dates for events where participation of a number of people is expected.

Call for improvement
I have left a call for adding information about software tools used in Event planning on the Article's talk page. Ajgorhoe 14:01, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on PhotoFiltre, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 16:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on BIMP, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 16:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Improve, not delete!
The argument that this article is advertising is not founded. It is just a description of a software, such as hundreds of others on Wikipedia, and it is for sure no more advertising than e.g. Mozilla Firefox or Corel Paint Shop Pro (except that maybe style should be improved - please do so).

Instead of deleting the article, it should be upgraded by improving style, quality of information and adding references. Please be constructive rather than destructive. Ajgorhoe 17:01, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

BIMP
A template has been added to the article BIMP, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. andy 17:59, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of BIMP Lite
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on BIMP Lite, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because BIMP Lite is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting BIMP Lite, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 14:00, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Amebis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 22:52, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Oto Pestner requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 22:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Alenka Godec requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. andy 22:57, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

About the article Settlement of Slavs in the Eastern Alps
Hi ! What do you think about the article written by Jalen, and about my commentary in "discussion" of the article? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Slavic_settlement_of_Eastern_Alps--Marcos G. Tusar (talk) 18:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

BIMP
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of BIMP, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://cerebralsynergy.com/download.php?view.52. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject:Europe/Slovenia
Hi! I invite you to join WikiProject Europe/Slovenia. --Eleassar my talk 08:18, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Translation
Hi! I wonder if you can tell me if this links are valid references to the article [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Bezgovo_cvrtje Bezgovo cvrtje, claimed to be a Slovenian national dish made of elderberries, fried in dough, (elderberries Sambucus nigra), recipes, to this article or possibly this ones:

Med.Over.Net http://www.slovenia.info/pictures/business_event/atachments_1/2006/Strategija_gastronomije-31.8.2006_4277.pdf http://www.mladina.si/tednik/200823/cejkotova_domacija__goce ref with picture

http://kitchenstories.blog.siol.net/2008/06/07/deliverance/ ref with picture

Bezgovec Po receptu, ki ga najdemo v knjigi Jedi na Goriškem, se iz zrelih bezgovih jagod in sladkorja pripravi tudi bezgovec za zimo. Zrelemu bezgu se obere jagode, ki se jih strese v lončeno ali leseno posodo in pretlači. Bezgovino shranimo v klet in počakamo, da nakisne. Potem jo pretlačimo skozi platneno ruto in pustimo, da se sok očisti. Precedimo ga skozi prtič in izmerimo, dodamo sladkor, kilogram na liter soka, in mešanico segrevamo. Ko zavre, kuhamo bezgovec še dvajset minut in sproti odstranjujemo pene. Nato bezgovec odstavimo in ga vročega nalijemo v ogrete steklenice, ki jih dobro zamašimo in hranimo za zimo. ALENKA TRATNIK Ocvrto bezgovo cvetje in domači bezgov sirup Foto: Alenka Tratnik

I am only guessing though.

Warrington (talk) 10:09, 19 January 2009 (UTC).

Re: Translation
Hi Warrington, links that you have listed are valid references to the above mentioned article, except the following one (which is only loosely related to the topic - it is a magazine article about a pub where the dish described in the article is also served): http://www.mladina.si/tednik/200823/cejkotova_domacija__goce

The text you have quoted talks about elderberry syrup and is therefore not directly related to the dish that the article is about. The last line says "Fried elder blossoms and a home-made elderberry syrup Photo: Alenka Tratnik". --Ajgorhoe (talk) 08:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for your answer! Unfortunatelly this article was deleted in the main time because or the lack of references.


 * I need to ask you some questions. Is that true that this is a Slovenian national dish? It is a bit disturbing that a national dish gets deleted, and if really is, than the article shoul be re-created.

Warrington (talk) 11:48, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Ajgorhoe! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 17:45, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Alenka Godec -

Welcome to WikiProject Slovenia


Welcome,, to the WikiProject Slovenia! Please direct any questions about the project to its talk page. If you create new articles on Slovenia-related topics, please list them at our announcement page and tag their talk page with our project template WikiProject Slovenia. A few features that you might find helpful:
 * The project's Navigation box points to most of the pages in the project that might be of use to you.
 * Most of the important discussions related to the project take place on the project's main talk page; you may find it useful to [ watchlist it].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask me or any of the more experienced members of the project, and we'll be very happy to help you. Again, welcome, and thank you for joining this project! --Eleassar my talk 17:00, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Inverse (program)


The article Inverse (program) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable sources independent of the subject. Tagged for five years for notability with no improvement. Google scholar search for inverse+c3m finds only single-digit citations.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:22, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Investigative Optimization Library


The article Investigative Optimization Library has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Couldn't establish WP:NOTABILITY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:13, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ZedGraph


A tag has been placed on ZedGraph requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Johanna (talk to me!) 23:25, 30 January 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of NPlot


A tag has been placed on NPlot requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. --allthefoxes (Talk) 03:51, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Contested deletion - NPlot
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance. The article is not about web content as has been speculated in the proposal for speedy deletion. NPlot is a free cross-platform .NET library that supports creation of various kinds of graphs. It is a licensed under the BSD license and is one of the few such libraries for the .NET platform. Ability to plot graphs is important for presentation of scientific results, technical data, financial data and in various other fields. Wikipedia's coverage on software libraries is rather weak and it would be good if more people helped to expand the information. Ajgorhoe (talk) 11:57, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Update: I have put this information on my talk page because the article was deleted before I could even react. Ajgorhoe (talk) 11:59, 31 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * List of widget toolkits
 * added a link pointing to Mono


 * Xamarin
 * added a link pointing to Mono

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Corrected. Thanks, Ajgorhoe (talk) 21:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of .NET libraries and frameworks, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages SCP, SFTP and SSH. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC) Corrected. Thanks, Ajgorhoe (talk) 10:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Eva Hren for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Eva Hren is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Eva Hren until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rogermx (talk) 22:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of NeuronDotNet


The article NeuronDotNet has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:18, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amebis


The article Amebis has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:20, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SendEmail


The article SendEmail has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:22, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Accord.NET


The article Accord.NET has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:23, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Xwt


The article Xwt has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of 'This article meets criteria A and B because...' and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 10:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Arguments against deletion of NeuronDotNet, Amebis, SendEmail, Accord.NET and Xwt
On June 20, these articles were templated for proposed deletion by Piotrus (see above) on grounds of supposed non-notability.

I disagree that the subjects of these articles are not notable enough to be included on Wikipedia. I provided some arguments on articles' respective talk pages.

The only exception might be the SendEmail article, for which I did not perform any checks. I've started this article quite some time ago when my view on subject's notability could have been different that it would have been today (due to that time's state of art), and I did not do any further considerations. For this article, I recommend that notability is verified by an editor who currently has more overview of e-mail clients (which I don't as I have not been involved in this area for quite some time), and eventually deletion can be proposed on solid grounds.

For all other articles of the group, I strongly suggest to expand and improve them. Due to lack of time I could only provide some additional references in some of these articles (or quickly pointed to a possible source, as in case of Accord.NET). --Ajgorhoe (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Update: I have de-PROD-ed some of the mentioned articles. Templates with explanations added here:


 * User_talk:Piotrus

As of my perception, convincing enough arguments why these articles should be deleted were not presented up to this point. For two of these subjects I strongly feel they should have articles on their own. For another two, I allow for the possibility that they might better be merged into another articles (which would be more difficult if they are deleted). This last opinion is based on my personal feeling, I don't feel competent enough to give strong judgement (except that the contents should not be just deleted) and I hope the community will eventually push things in good direction. Current text should preferably be improved and better referenced in all these cases.

Please note that I am not an owner or being responsible for these articles, as Wikipedia is a collaborative voluntary project. I am just stating what I think would be best form the perspective of overall improvement. If neither I nor anybody else did not engage enough to perfect on these article in short time of nomination, this does not by itself prove that there is ground for non-notability claims. I was not presented by enough convincing arguments that I could believe that simply deleting the respected articles would not have negative impact. --Ajgorhoe (talk) 02:48, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I've reviewed your arguments. In some cases, I am not disputing removal of the prod, as I found those arguments/sources convincing. In others I've decided to ask for community input at AfD. It's worth remembering WP:NOTCATALOGUE and WP:ITSIMPORTANT. Cheers, --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:42, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your notice. I'll try to participate in AfD discussions. --Ajgorhoe (talk) 03:45, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of NeuronDotNet for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NeuronDotNet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NeuronDotNet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:19, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Xwt for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Xwt is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Xwt until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:38, 27 June 2017 (UTC)

New article
Zato ker govorite slovenščino, lepo prosim izboljšajte to:Irena Yebuah Tiran. Moj slovenski je slabši od srbskega :-) Moja najljubša slovenska skupina je Navihanke. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:52, 27 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Hi, unfortunately I don't know the subject of this article well. If I find time I'll try to check a bit, but will probably not be able to help substantially. --Ajgorhoe (talk) 03:54, 1 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Boka (waterfall)) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Boka (waterfall), Ajgorhoe!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Could you please add your sources"

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 08:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Elcor, Minnesota
Hello, Ajgorhoe!

Would you have any interest in translating the Featured Article Elcor, Minnesota for the Slovenian Wikipedia? Since many of the immigrants who settled here were from Slovenia, I think having the article translated in this language is important, especially for any relatives of former residents who may be looking for information about the town. Thanks! DrGregMN (talk) 14:13, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of .NET libraries and frameworks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CLR ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_.NET_libraries_and_frameworks check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_.NET_libraries_and_frameworks?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 9 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of .NET libraries and frameworks, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_.NET_libraries_and_frameworks check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_.NET_libraries_and_frameworks?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: corrected. --Ajgorhoe (talk) 13:13, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Rjavina
Hello, Ajgorhoe,

Thanks for creating Rjavina! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with. And, don't forget to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Done. --Ajgorhoe (talk) 20:19, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of Uno (software) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uno (software) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Uno (software) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. signed,Rosguill talk 04:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)

July 2022
Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:28, 27 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello, in my opinion the stated argumentation for reverting this edit is flawed. I am explaining my opinion point by point, in relation to the above stated arguments. I do not see a reason to assume that Avalonia UI is a non-notable entity. E.g., majority of entries in the Section where the Avalonia entity was added have their public code repositories on GitHub. Quantitative indicators accessible on the these repositories' main pages like forks, stars, and watching suggest comparable notability than other entries in the Section. The two references that were included in my edit also state some facts that confirm the importance of the Avalonia framework for the .NET ecosystem (also relative to other entries in the Section), and I was about to add the third reference before my edit was reverted. Avalonia was one of very few production-capable UI frameworks available in the early times of .NET Core (later renamed to .NET). It still is one of the very few such .NET UI frameworks available on multiple OS (beside e.g. the Uno Platform and recently emerging MAUI). The guidelines link used in your argument refers to lists of people, which the article in question is not. The article in question is also not merely a list, but it also provides more general information about the subject (.NET libraries and frameworks), including some information specific to .NET. In this respect, list-like entries in subsequent sections also provide important information on the overall state and features of the .NET development ecosystem, and the article would be incomplete (and it is rather poorly complete, unfortunately) without stating the major items. In a similar way, for example, Mono-specific_innovations provide important information about Mono_(software) itself and the article on Mono would be very incomplete without stating this important information, although most (or all) individual items in the section don't have their own articles. Anyway, the link you have provided is concerned with lists of people, maybe this section would be more relevant. This section refers to this example, which, in my opinion, also indicates that the deleted edit is perfectly in line with the guidelines. I am restoring the deleted text, I hope my arguments are convincing enough. Ajgorhoe (talk) 18:16, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
 * I am unconvinced. The fact remains, that is a list of entries with prexisting Wikipedia articles, and what you are adding has not got one. That some other article uses different criteria is immaterial. That one library or another has social media likes (or stars or what have you) is also immaterial. MrOllie (talk) 22:06, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 28 November 2023 (UTC)