User talk:Ajmacias

October 2022
Hello, I'm Blaze Wolf. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lambda Upsilon Lambda without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:40, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lambda Upsilon Lambda, you may be blocked from editing. Tommi1986 let's talk! 19:53, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lambda Upsilon Lambda. Tommi1986 let's talk! 20:04, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, The information your publishing is private information that shouldn’t be on display. Ajmacias (talk) 20:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * False. It's reliably sourced so it is public. Welcome to the internet. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:05, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Can you show me the link where Lambda Upsilon Lambda states this information? Ajmacias (talk) 20:13, 26 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Read the damn article. There are multiple references. ― Blaze WolfTalk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 20:14, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm inclined to agree with Ajmacias on this point. The sources used to cite the pre-colombian sources of LUL's iconography do not actually mention LUL. The articles contain images of pre-colombian art, or images of LUL iconography, and the editor (or editors) who added the material have engaged in original research to connect the two. Without a reliable source indicating that LUL has specifically (and publicly) chosen this pre-colombian iconography and its associated meanings, we really should not include the information. Ajmacias, you, on the other hand, should have opened a discussion on the matter once your edit was reverted. I'll do that now. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:19, 26 October 2022 (UTC)
 * My issue was not that they were removing refs, but that they were claiming the information was private when clearly it is not. They also gave implications that they were attempting to WP:OWN the article. ― <b style="background:#0d1125;color:#51aeff;padding:1q;border-radius:5q;">Blaze Wolf</b>Talk<sub title="Discord Username" style="margin-left:-22q;">Blaze Wolf#6545 21:22, 26 October 2022 (UTC)