User talk:Ajournaleditor

June 2010
Welcome. I note your contributions to Stem cell, Adult stem cell etc. did not have supporting citations. Please be careful to indicate where you got the content so that readers can verify those sources for themselves. Otherwise edits are liable to be seen as original research, which would fundamentally contradict the policies on which Wikipedia is based. Don't be overly concerned about the form of citation, that is flexible and in any case comes with practice. The presence of citations should be regarded as a sine qua non for adding any assertion. Cheers LeadSongDog come howl!  16:36, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
I'd also like to see some citations. Can you give a citation for this bit of information on the page "Mesenchymal Stem Cell" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mesenchymal_stem_cell

"An extremely rich source for mesenchymal stem cells is the developing tooth bud of the mandibular third molar. While considered multipotent, they may prove to be pluripotent. The stem cells eventually form enamel, dentin,blood vessels, dental pulp, nervous tissues, including a minimum of 29 different unique end organs. Because of extreme ease in collection at 8–10 years of age before calcification and minimal to no morbidity they will probably constitute a major source for personal banking, research and multiple therapies. These stem cells have been shown capable of producing hepatocytes." Mscwizard (talk) 19:25, 24 September 2010 (UTC)Mscwizard
 * That could perhaps be found in PMID 19107607 (fulltext here), but I haven't been over it in detail. LeadSongDog come howl!  20:22, 24 September 2010 (UTC)