User talk:Ajperks


 * Mr. Perks, I'd like you to review our WP:COI guidelines and then comment if you'd still like to be unblocked. It is usually a bad idea to add links to sites that you are associated with and is the reason why Edgar181 blocked you.  If your account had been named something else it might not have been so apparent, but if your contributions to the encyclopedia continued to consist solely of links to your site you would have still been blocked. Syrthiss (talk) 15:36, 23 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, yes and no. In fact I just looked at several of the references in the article, and removed one as also selling a service instead of really referencing the information quoted.  Thats essentially what we require of our references: (1) they accurately support what is being said in the link and (2) the link is reliable, in that the material presented there is unlikely to be biased.  When I look at the link I kept in the sound regulations section, I see what looks like a commercial site but with helpful information to explain the huge pdf on the sound level code.  When I look at your site, I see your link to free software but I see nothing that supports the statements regarding water efficiency.  In general, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a valid basis for including something.  I hope this helps. Syrthiss (talk) 18:39, 23 April 2010 (UTC)