User talk:Ak1849/Senaya language

Final Review
Hi Abdullah, this is my feedback for your final project. As a reminder, the 6 points on which I'm grading you are Language, Structure, Balance, Accuracy, Relevance, and Length. Here are my assessments on each of those areas:


 * 1) Language: The article would benefit from some minor proofing here and there. In addition to errors, the language is at times unencyclopedic (e.g. "the language is special"). 4 points.
 * 2) Structure: The article follows the suggested template. 5 points.
 * 3) Balance: At present, the article appears to reflect a neutral point of view. 5 points.
 * 4) Accuracy: It is hard to gauge the accuracy of the article because not all claims are backed by references, and nearly all the references point to a single article. 2 points.
 * 5) Relevance: Nearly all of the information is relevant to the subject. 5 points.
 * 6) Length: Word count 1481/2000 (including headers but not bibliography). 4 points.

The final score is 25/30. Have a great summer! Chuck Haberl (talk) 15:04, 12 May 2021 (UTC)