User talk:Ak47K

Copernicus
Fair enough I am not disagreeing with you - I am however saying it is best just to completely drop his nationality from the Physics article until the whole thing is properly resolved, otherwise we are going to end up with a revert war kicking off there too, and that page will have to be locked. He is but one name in an article covering one of the fundamental sciences, his nationality shouldn't be brought in until it has been decided what the proper usage is by consensus. SFC9394 22:42, 6 March 2006 (UTC)

Hallo
Thanks for your good work in protecting articles from deletion of nazi atrocities and PoV pushers. I know it can be hard sometimes to protect an article on Wiki and I am glad you have willpower to oversee many of them. --Molobo 11:38, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for restoring Molobo's version of Silesian Uprising page so that I can properly edit it (my last edit was flawed) and make it NPOV.--Jadger 18:24, 7 March 2006 (UTC) I suggest starting with this book --Molobo 18:51, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Double naming
Hi. As per Talk:Gdansk/Vote, please do not remove double naming from articles. A large majority supported double naming for cities like Gdansk/Danzig, Malbork/Marienburg, etc. For details see Talk:Gdansk/Vote -- Chris 73 | Talk 21:12, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Please see this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Russsian_claims_about_Warsaw_Uprising_1794 The author tries to put information from non-objective source as objective article. The source is from Imperial Russia regarding Polish uprising against its occupation. Imperial Russia was known for fabricating and being source of many antipolish fabrications. Because I didn't want to delete this(no blanking) I moved it to a proper article that would deal with claim. --Molobo 03:11, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

Warto zobaczyć tą dyskusję
 --Molobo 16:04, 7 April 2006 (UTC)