User talk:Akandkur/Archive 2

Nomination of List of PBS member stations (table) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of PBS member stations (table) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of PBS member stations (table) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Fuddle (talk) 21:23, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

September 2023
There is currently a discussion on whether locally produced programming should be included in programming tables in 2023 in American televison. Instead of edit warring, please participate in the discussion on whether or not it should be included. Thank you! Esolo5002 (talk) 03:55, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (third request)
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Draft:Children's programming on The CW. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:50, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

BBC Midlands Today
I reverted your edit to BBC Midlands Today because the subject is not notable. Please read WP:SPINOUT for further instruction. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 01:09, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Midlands Today for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Midlands Today is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Midlands Today until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chris Troutman ( talk ) 02:22, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam- album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam- album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Children's programming on The CW (November 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Children's programming on The CW and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Children%27s_programming_on_The_CW Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Vanderwaalforces&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Children%27s_programming_on_The_CW reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:33, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Do you think you could help this editor? This, and a lot of their edits could use some work, particularly sourcing. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 10:40, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Akandkur. Thank you for your work on List of Nickelodeon Movies productions. User:DreamRimmer, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

 𝙳𝚛𝚎𝚊𝚖𝚁𝚒𝚖𝚖𝚎𝚛  𝚍𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜  10:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

What's this?
You said that A Really Haunted Loud House and Monster High 2 aren't Nickelodeon Movies? Nickelodeon745 (talk) 23:40, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * They're not nickelodeon movies, they're just nickelodeon original productions movies. Plus, there's no nickelodeon movies logo in it. It's called evidence. Akhil K. (talk) 23:42, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Dang! --Nickelodeon745 (talk) 23:45, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * They were right there in the beginning. Including with Snow Day. 2600:6C51:627F:4D5:6C2B:7714:CA0E:7C38 (talk) 19:37, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

January 2024
Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Elvisisalive95 (talk) 02:39, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Stop making PBS logos free.
Please stop making PBS logos free. 47.230.152.9 (talk) 15:36, 3 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Where’s the source for these? Akhil K. (talk) 15:37, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Don't make them free. 47.230.152.9 (talk) 15:39, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Where’s the source for the logos? Akhil K. (talk) 15:47, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * No! They can't be free and move to Commons. 47.230.152.9 (talk) 15:48, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

February 2024
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on File:PBS (1984-2019) logo.svg. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. On top of all this, proposed deletion is inappropriate for any controversial deletions; this is a matter more appropriate for the files for discussion process.  WC  Quidditch  ☎   ✎  19:40, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Orphaned non-free image File:Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam- album cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Hum Dil De Chuke Sanam- album cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:36, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

KTSF
The paragraphs I removed were ones I had replaced when I did my rewrite of the article to meet the good article criteria last year but had failed to remove. They should have been removed months ago. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 23:31, 16 February 2024 (UTC)

Stop making PBS logos free again.
Like another IP address said, stop making PBS logos logos free. 2603:7000:B8F0:C70:80E5:711F:929B:2A0 (talk) 13:07, 3 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024
Please stop. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Nickelodeon Movies productions and other related pages, you may be blocked from editing. DrinkingOuttaDrinks (talk) 04:09, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello. These movies: Snow Day (2022), Baby Shark's Big Movie! (2023), and The Thundermans Return (2024) appear to be unsourced as they are Nickelodeon original films. Akhil K. (talk) 17:53, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi! All three films as you mentioned were actually Paramount+ streaming exclusives. While yes, they have aired simultaneously on Nickelodeon on their release dates, they are more of Paramount+ exclusives in general. Hopefully, this clears things up. DrinkingOuttaDrinks (talk) 10:36, 6 March 2024 (UTC)
 * And yes, not Nickelodeon Movies films. Akhil K. (talk) 15:03, 6 March 2024 (UTC)