User talk:Akashimemory

I wanted to post about influences within conscious awareness and vision as a sense of a reality. And when it involves the concept of being asleep and awake.


 * In accordance to change my original visual that appears to influence my conscious sense of reality. I observed my feeling in my objective body about my imagination. In a recent visualization to make apparent about my self, I envisioned a characteristic of symbolism that would contribute to a sub category of "dark" behavior. But also an interpretation of consciously recognizing what happens because of my influence from violence. Instead of trying to describe a story project for the reader to assume, my attention directs itself (involuntarily and voluntarily) to what is considered "split" space that acquires an observation of movement as a sense. Usually dominate from hearing, seeing, touching. Since that regards being human, there are those who believe it is my real feeling.


 * Earlier I had recognized without the visual or vision of the present moment of the meditation experience of the idea of who i am and the techniques, process, thinking, etc; the mirror (effect) affect that is staring at the reflection unaware of the body standing there [usually attention is on the background of what/who is in the reflection as though it is who they...] Sitting in two chairs, one turns the head to the right, two turns head to the right [usually to confirm what feels right] ... Being across from each other as though they both are known as similar persons [make sense] ... For audio and visual purposes

As in touch and sense of sight There seems to be _______

sleep >>>


 * asleep and awake
 * 1) I had heard through an other's intellect about his concept that followed a routine of sleeping for ten minutes out of every hour. I kept that spoken memory with me to this time frame of my own present. Since I still observe in my memory my own perception of exploration to conscious being. When I notice if I am awake in my own perception of imagination. Yet I still have a hint that within all of this consciousness that this information has been provided for my characteristics as though outside of it all I am in movement with another individual.

within primitive feelings of significant and insignificant big or little dreams that are believed and involve the life and death of a marriage partner, that counter being a human. that involve the memory of either. there seems to be a pattern in small talk, casual conversations and discussions that They go back, stuck in a loop, or feel repetitive to be happy holistically. since meaning, value, and share are still in attention.
 * dreams

Currently exploring within my conscious and senses through time of memory maker[s] that involve the group-mind and projects that are associated with it.
 * memory

It could have been brought to my attention through several aspects of imagery and an idea to make sense of within time when first person dreamer hears from an other that there is a position of a poser who stares down at a small yellow cup filled with black coffee that involve an individual who sits at the table with several regular sized white coffee mugs with a design of almond shaped eyes that appear empty. I think this has to deal with attention, a search for a seek of what One wants or needs. That ultimately always forces and resists a display or feeling of self-talk/expression. When its about function and

which of my original function in my own visual and vision of a sense made me sit down today at the computer screen to still wonder if its memory or a uncontrolled dream that was felt as real. i can only say to myself that there is a blend and blur of what my conscious awareness considers a state. it conflicts to location to place to body organ. there still is a quiet force that commands and demands by name of status to get out or leave, a lot of what i would associate myself with when i'm in knowledge of involuntary.

For a certain perpose I have recognized within my development and contribution that today is about feelings from myself and of an other as we are in physical proximity for my own bias of maturity. usually in previous memory I have wrote to them on the internet and through social media which eventually lead to exchange of phone numbers, email, and phone calls, that lead up to meeting physically. Yet because of all of that, I have now wondered if a crush is really a real feeling with a person whom I am now around. Instead I have said to myself usually while alone that "yeah, I have a crush, etc" while my mind would try and assess that feeling trying to dig it up from emotional being. Somewhere within me, I see her today, and immediately recognized that rush of a suggestion to "go over and tell her then" so I turn around and stare at her reading a book and then began again if its really something I should do. It was the common, "what am I going to really ask when I approach" to imagining her own response to then going back to is it my feeling and would the surroundings change me or the whole set-up? I think I eventually told myself and I don't know whether or not if its a cop-out that "it'll just happen without explanation nor questioning or psycho analyzing" and then I would believe that would be truth.
 * conscious awareness

a typical conversation would be considered a nomadic habit as well as a "way" to get to know an other of the "who, what, how, and Y" and it would be believed that it is real in any kind of format because of the sense of when its involved in/out "physical" conscious. There is usually an aim or a purpose that "over"lap and mechanically play from display regarded as "close" or "far". Most are not usually conscious or paying enough attention to the sense that is cost/cost with the brain stimulation and function of the phrase "arm/leg" that keep the memory or attention [after-image/imagination-image] of OPEN/shut that involved body contact whether it felt REAL or real. And because of all of this, I am now "Dumb" to think they imagine that their thoughts talk to them in a form of a box within a rectangle as example of subject [screen] to object [viewer] or head to body. When it becomes a story followed by the concept of time. And even with all of this, it still ignorant to recognizing what is "over" my shoulder in perception of movement.
 * sense of reality

state of death and suicide
According to a Google definition, the word death is just a state (probably the place) yet if you look up the word suicide it Google will not show a definition, its first link will appear for a wikipedia page. I briefly read that its mostly involves difficulties with finances, TROUBLED relationships, or Bullying. I am familiar with all the above, maybe not in each personal in first person experience or memory. Relational. I only bring this up in my attention and perhaps any one else via any type of social aspect or communication because in my research in my "life" its been repetitive in any given information from an expected job or employment or the education standard of science and intellectual media when regarding that it always seemed and felt like real events and real people. yet there is apparent reasons to continue this charade and routine to justify and use what is called- non fiction and fiction with in/out any activity that human beings do. I haven't specifically had a conversation where i had to plan out every little word in order to have a "clear" understanding/ As in, representing my self and forming the OTHER to coercive the context and talking to "make it click" for an comprehension. I think I would only be partial in what I noticed in the shared space to speak to each other. However I'm mostly sure that if I were to engage in any conversation in the present, the structure wouldn't even be necessary in regards to direct line of "who-who"s communicating.

on an added note would it and does it make a difference to have narration for your life or for a series of images. lets go to the sandbox to finish this convo

Most of that was blurred in trying to get my point across in letting my self know to "differentiate" why some use the terms imagination, and why some use spirit to "be real" or "be somewhere real"

Welcome!
Hello, Akashimemory, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Please see WP:NOTWEBHOST. Drmies (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2019 (UTC)

Un/Modern
This section is added since I read a book based on Psychology that is Title Dreams. Yet within that, it seems to be in sections namely: > Ancestral >Figurative >Medical >Modern

Yet somehow its all supposedly connected to gether in any state or sense or voice. And I don't know about you but there still seems to be conflict and wars going on probably because its all sleep at some point and talking when believed to be awake. if/when in/out all those places that the people "know" about or of some of the namely sections

where is what is philosophy in any of these places. the questions might sound or be heard as monotone or image/imagination or believed to be in an other state of mind. questions and asks coincide with authors and writers

what was it that made the "you" go back or return or whatever it was. was it even stated in a question. oh so Google just told me the definition that the noun would be a sentence worded or expressed. yet the verb would be an ask of someone. which sounds like incriminating behavior or psychology aspects of bad mental health. probably to continue the form of an organization where like in childhood you yourself did not question the "family" just were told who they were suppose to be for you.

with a slight variation of the family aspect when I, alone, in this moment have only the supposed memory and imagination in regards to the attitude of money that seems to compare and contrast in order to apparently either be seen different, or feel in an other way. I think that could be a possibility to recognize yourself that had changed. I notice of attention that in this reflection, that its associations and about the persons involved or represented have a pro/con relation for and in an action.