User talk:Akashkumarmandal

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 14:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to 270 (number). Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. ''As I review your contribs, they are all original research. That's a problem''. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 14:32, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 14:34, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 14:36, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi Akashkumarmandal! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. --67.85.37.186 (talk) 14:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)