User talk:Akashvermadzzz

October 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ayodhya. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Do not change WP:COMMONNAME and add unsourced languagues Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:03, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Faizabad. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:05, 28 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Stop adding "Tehsil ...." as another name in the Fatehpur, Barabanki article. Tehsil is an administrative division. Other name is a different name of the settlement with which it is referred to inj the present or the past. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:15, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Kinu t/c 18:03, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

November 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Shah Rukh Khan, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. LiberatorG (talk) 05:39, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Chhattisgarh. LiberatorG (talk) 05:57, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Salman Khan. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:55, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add any Indic script, to any of our India related articles. Do not add Indic scripts in Indian articles as you did here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:49, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
- Please STOP changing Allahabad to Prayagraj - Wikipedia articles use the WP:COMMONNAME in English - Arjayay (talk) 19:36, 5 December 2019 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Allahabad district, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 14:44, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.  Spencer T• C 19:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)

Dabangg 3
Hi, I reverted your edits to Dabangg 3 as your changes were contradicted by the sources in the article. If you have a source for updated numbers, you should include it with your edit. Thanks! Schazjmd  (talk)  22:17, 25 December 2019 (UTC)


 * You've done this again, and I've reverted your changes. If you want to change a sourced number, you must include the source for that new number, avoiding blogs, producer tweets, IMDB, etc. If you aren't sure, ask on the article talk page.  If you keep doing this, you can end up blocked again.  Ravensfire  (talk) 03:59, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

December 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Salman Khan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. ''You just came back from a block. You shouldn't start making unconstructive edits again. '' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:24, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

WP:ELNO
Hi there, re: this, if there is already an official website or a verified social media account for someone, please don't add any more. We're not here to do marketing for our article subjects. Please see WP:ELNO. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
 * I also don't understand why you removed all of this content from the article on Shah Rukh Khan. Can you clarify that below, please? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:55, 30 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dabangg 3, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 10:46, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of cities in India by population. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:04, 1 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:58, 1 January 2020 (UTC)