User talk:Akatskiash

Winchester Mystery House
There is no libel here, so that's not a reason to remove the content. ... disco spinster   talk  20:52, 20 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi there. WP:LIBEL Libelous material (otherwise known as defamation) is reasonably likely to damage a person or company's reputation and could expose Wikipedia to legal consequences. It seems as though this person interviewed someone to support their opinion that this business is "emphasizing fabrications and inaccuracies". Claiming that "tour guides are required to follow a script emphasizing fabrications and inaccuracies" is libelous of the business as it is not an information source adhering to a neutral point of view. Akatskiash (talk) 21:02, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * If the tour guide really did say that, it's not libel. ... disco spinster   talk  22:09, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * The tour guide may have said it, but it is libelous as, once again, it is not adhering to a neutral viewpoint of the current page. The material damages the companies reputation, whether someone said it or not. Akatskiash (talk) 23:34, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * That is not how Wikipedia works, the editor cites the source, and that source is responsible for the content. We don't write the page to reflect the business's reputation. Sgerbic (talk) 23:48, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Please view Wikipedia's guideline under WP:LIBEL. That is how it works in a specific case like this with defamation. You can't go to a page and share anything you want. The source is unverified information. They person shared a quote from an interview in a book, but this info is an unverified opinion and written as libelous material. That is the only reason I am removing it. Thank you. Akatskiash (talk) 00:04, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sources do not need to be "verified", whatever that means. The source is reliable and we can and should report what reliable sources say.Also, you are edit warring by continuing to restore the edits that several other editors have reverted. Please stop editing the article and discuss your change on the article talk page. CodeTalker (talk) 00:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * This is discussing on the talk page. It was not serval editors, it was one that kept reverting. And I did not go past two because I do not want to be in an edit war. Was just trying to do the decision I thought was best to void exposing Wikipedia to legal consequences. Thank you. Akatskiash (talk) 01:16, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @User:Akatskiash, you have a total of 6 edits so we can charitably assume you are not familiar with the encyclopedia's editorial policies. In this situation you might stop to consider what experienced editors are trying to tell you here, that WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV is not libel. It is Wikipedia reporting what a reliable independent source says. Another policy you need to familiarize yourself with is WP:EDITWAR. &#45; LuckyLouie (talk) 00:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Sad that you viewing my amount of edits reverts you to bringing down my intelligence. I am aware of edit war, and i was cautious of not reverting it more than three times and am not looking to. Simply was trying to follow wikipedia rules to avoid exposing Wikipedia to legal consequences. Thank you. Akatskiash (talk) 01:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)