User talk:Akd112358

Welcome!
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 14:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

April 2024
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Itihasa, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -  Let's talk!  15:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi Joshua,
 * In the context of Itihasa, there is discourse about describing Hindu Itihasa as "myth" as the word is pejorative. In the past, it has been used to discredit Hindu Religion, Greek Religion, Roman Religion, and several other non Abrahamic faiths. Akd112358 (talk) 14:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)


 * In a scholarly context, "mythology" is not pejorative, on the contrary. See also reference 1 of Itihasa. Regards, Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!  15:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:Kashmiri. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 07:07, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi Akd112358! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Babri Masjid several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Vishnu Sahasranama. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dāsānudāsa (talk) 15:39, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Introduction to contentious topics
Kautilya3 (talk) 15:16, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

May 2024
 You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Vishnu Sahasranama) for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 18:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)