User talk:Akdc14

N o f o rmation Talk  02:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC) N o f o rmation Talk  02:36, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Chiropractic
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Arcandam (talk) 01:18, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop making edits which do not reflect established consensus that has been discussed at the article's talk page. Such edits may constitute vandalism and can result in the loss of your editing privileges. Please discuss controversial edits on the talk page. Thank you. Arcandam (talk) 01:48, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

help me
User arcandam has continually reverted my edits on the topic Chiropractic, even though they are completely qualified and accurate. How to avoid an edit war? Many of these things have already been discussed on the talk page and have not had any progress made. Thanks. Akdc14 (talk) 01:38, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It is impossible to avoid an editwar in this case since you have already editwarred. 3 different editors disagree with your edits, if you continue without consensus on the talkpage you may be blocked. Your edits are not "completely qualified and accurate". Please find a reliable source. We have a special page for health-related issues: WP:MEDRS. And please read WP:BRD. Arcandam (talk) 01:50, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

July 2012
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them, in order to gain consensus over whether or not to include, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you. Sædon talk 01:42, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Arcandam (talk) 02:05, 16 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Hello Akdc14. You are invited to reply at WP:AN3. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:53, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:35, 25 July 2012 (UTC)