User talk:Akhil.anand.hisar

Welcome
Hello, Akhil.anand.hisar, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! DanielRigal (talk) 22:00, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of VARUN SANKHLA


A tag has been placed on VARUN SANKHLA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Singularity42 (talk) 11:48, 17 August 2011 (UTC)


 * I did go ahead and delete this page because 2 hours later there was still no explanation of who the person is, why he is notable, etc. If you believe the person really is notable, I recommend creating a draft in your user space (if you're not sure how, just ask me and I'll help), get the minimum necessary info into the article (including reliable sources to verify why he is notable), and then after that move it into main space. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:38, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Yadav, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 11:52, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Yadav. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 13:56, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Jat people. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Sitush (talk) 13:59, 17 August 2011 (UTC)

Page number
Please could you let me know what page number of Enthoven supports the statement that you have just reverted at Yadav. The cite says p. 24 but there is no mention of the issue on that page. - Sitush (talk) 19:04, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ahirs. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Yadav, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 19:47, 27 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Also, you are 100% wrong to say that foreign sources are not acceptable. There is not, nor has there ever been a requirement for "local" sources; in fact, Wikipedia tends to prefer international or transnational sources when available.  Also, the Puranas are not a reliable source for, well, anything other than articles about the Puranas or other articles about Indian mythology/religion, and then only to state exactly what they puranas themselves state.  This is exactly like how I can't use the Bible to state that in or around the time of Jesus's death the sun suddenly went dark in the sky.  In fact, I can't even use the Bible as a reference that Jesus actually existed.  Old religious documents simply are not reliable sources for scholarly work.  Qwyrxian (talk) 04:05, 28 August 2011 (UTC)

Using multiple accounts
Please note that you are not allowed to use multiple accounts in most cases. You are especially not allowed to use multiple accounts to make it look like there is more support for a particular issue than just one person. In Sockpuppet investigations/Akhil.anand.hisar, you were found to have used a second account, and this account was definitely used at Yadav to attempt to extend your edit warring. While the admin who blocked you sockpuppet declined to block you, you do need to understand that if you use multiple accounts again, it is likely that all of your editing privileges will be suspended. Qwyrxian (talk) 23:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)