User talk:Akindofmagick

It's a biter, not bider
Please revert all changes on Texas A&M University Corps of Cadets of "bider" back to "biter." See the talk page for the etymology of the word (it comes from cockbiter...a bit vulgar, but a history nonetheless and the correct terminology. On top of that, the terminology was intentionally defined early in order to be used throughout the article and integrate Aggie terminology into the lexicon. Respectfully, please revert those changes. — BQZip01 —  talk 05:40, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Please look up Garrison Cap - "bider" (with a definite "d" sound) is another perfectly acceptable (and far less offensive) spelling of this slang term, and is the correct form of the word as used when I was in the Corps (do BQs actually say bye-ter? 'cuz we said "bye-der"). When I first read this article, I was mystifed by the "biter" spelling/pronunciation, as it was completely new to me. Interestingly, throughout my Navy career, whenever I inadvertently used the term "bider" for my garrison cap, I was met with blank looks - it's not a term in general usage in the Navy (regardless of the spelling) - which is why I added the definition and link to "garrison cap" to this article. There is a plethora of Aggie terminology in the article, and rightfully so - however, I see no valid reason for being intentionally, repeatedly, unnecessarily offensive/rude. I respectfully submit that some Campusology is best kept on campus - such as the Corps slang term for mayo. Akindofmagick 04:27, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Bonfire pics?
Howdy Akindofmagick! We're looking for Bonfire pictures, as the article is lacking in them. It's currently a featured article candidate. Do you happen to have any pictures that you can add under one of the free licenses?  Blue Ag09  (Talk) 22:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

RFC/USER discussion concerning (ThreeE)
Hello,. Please be aware that a request for comments has been filed concerning ThreeE's conduct on Wikipedia. The RFC entry can be found by "ThreeE" in this list, and the actual discussion can be found at Requests for comment/ThreeE, where I would appreciate your participation and comments. — BQZip01 — talk 11:59, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


 * I appreciate your comments. In retrospect, I feel that my comments were out of line (and I have stated as such...see the talk page), but I also feel that if we take anyone's comments from every time/place, we would find many instances of vented frustration and inappropriate comments that would not pass in civilized society. As a former naval officer, I expect you heard more than a few curse words from some old/crusty chiefs...but at the same time, they likely didn't affect performance reviews either unless the actions were egregious (chewing out some junior enlisted sailor at his wedding or something like that).
 * I too support a "typical stairstep discipline procedure"
 * Letter of Warning (several notices given)
 * Letter of Censure (not sure what that is, but sounds like an ultimatum or final warning)
 * Suspension (done - 18 hrs)
 * Extended Suspension (done - 36 hrs)
 * Ban (not yet done)
 * "Note that this disciplinary progression should apply to BOTH editors in question." I couldn't agree more. My actions have already been punished too. I took my rebuke and I learned from it.
 * "In fact, I suspect this episode will come back to haunt and deeply embarass both gentlemen at some later date - when trying to get a job, for example.. c'mon, guys, is this the sort of thing you want a potential boss to learn about you??" I seriously hope you aren't threatening to report this to anyone. That would go completely against Wikipedia and its policies; this is a free and open forum. I firmly understand and your point is well taken (received loud and clear), but I respectfully request you omit that last sentences as they might be construed as a violation of No legal threats.


 * BQZip01: Well, you've once again utterly floored me. How on earth could you construe my comment to be a threat - legal or otherwise??? Everything you've written on Wikipedia is on permanent record, stored on multiple servers - deleting a comment does nothing to change that. I made a simple statement of fact: that (when you get out of the service and start searching for a real job,) this debacle may very well come back to haunt you. There have been NUMEROUS media reports of such things happening over the past five years or so. A simple web search - by anyone who wanted to hire you and knew your Wikipedia username - would turn up this rather vivid exhibition of poor judgment. Breaking News Flash here: Employers ROUTINELY run internet searches on prospective employees nowadays. They want to know if you've uploaded naughty photos to your Facebook page or posted inappropriate comments on your personal blog, or whatever.
 * As a current military officer and potential future beltway bandit - with a security clearance - may I respectfully suggest - and this is only a suggestion for you to consider, NOT a threat - delivered from the vantage of my advanced age! - that it behooves all of us never to fail to behave in a manner most circumspect. Speaking from personal experience: the safest bet is NEVER to post anything in a public forum or private email that you wouldn't want your mother and your boss to see - because otherwise the outcome can be more than a little embarrassing.
 * To be perfectly blunt: I have no idea who you are IRL, and quite honestly (harsh as it may sound) don't care; I haven't given your problem with ThreeE a single moment's thought since entering my comment - AT YOUR REQUEST - last week. And now I've spent way too much time thinking about it - which won't happen again, and that's a promise!! Akindofmagick 18:00, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I never meant for this to be taken in such a hostile way. It was simply a request. Again, your point is well taken and will continue to be addressed (I'll watch what I post). Fair 'nuff? — BQZip01 —  talk 21:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

2008 South Ossetia war
See User_talk:Biologylessons. --- Best regards, Melancholie (talk) 23:35, 17 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Rudolph Ulrich


A tag has been placed on Rudolph Ulrich requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.pacifichorticulture.org/articles/rudolph-ulrichs-arizona-gardens/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick (Talk)  12:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)


 * I have objected to this speedy deletion. Please do not create articles with copyright violations.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 13:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks for helping prevent the speedy deletion of the Rudolph Ulrich stub article. I threw the page up as a place holder late last night, and intended to work on it more today. I personally spearheaded the restoration of Ulrich's Hotel Del Monte Arizona Garden as Executive Officer at the Naval Postgraduate School (NPS) from 1993-1995, continuing with the project even after my retirement from the USN in Dec 1994. Julie Cain, whose article I linked to, used the research I collected on Ulrich's groundbreaking Arizona Gardens to spearhead the authentic restoration of Stanford University's much more badly neglected Arizona Garden, beginning in 1999. I turned over my archives, records and photographs to the NPS Public Affairs Office in 2001; these records form part of the NPS Museum collection. I found Ulrich tough to research, despite his fascinating life and works (for example: I located information in San Francisco's botanical gardens library indicating Ulrich had assisted Frederick Law Olmsted with the design and construction of New York's Central Park as one of his earliest projects after arriving in the USA), as there is little in print regarding him. Dr. David Streatfield, whose quote I had placed on the initial version of this article, was a key resource in my research. In order that Ulrich's name and role as the designer and architect of the HDM/NPS Arizona Garden would not again be forgotten, the Friends of the Arizona Garden had a bronze plaque made and mounted on a large boulder in the center of the Garden. Our names are written into the concrete base buried beneath the boulder. I'll step back now, tho, and let y'all take the lead on this article. Akindofmagick (talk) 14:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)