User talk:Akmalhaziq

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Akmalhaziq, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 08:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Your contributed article, Wound healing Q&A


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Wound healing Q&A. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Wound healing. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Wound healing - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:15, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Wound healing Q&amp;A
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Wound healing Q&amp;A, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, then you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 12:22, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011
Your addition to Shock (circulatory) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Muhandes (talk) 12:52, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Shock (circulatory), please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muhandes (talk) 12:57, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Shock (circulatory). Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please stop inserting unsourced material Muhandes (talk) 13:00, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Shock (circulatory). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Muhandes (talk) 13:12, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
 * It seems like you are copy-pasting material from some sources, as the text is written like in a textbook. If you are, it is most likely violating the copyrights of the writer. If not, please supply the source of your material. --Muhandes (talk) 13:35, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Rheumatic fever
Hi Akmal, thanks for your contributions to the rheumatic fever article. However I've removed some of the text you added there, because Wikipedia is not a medical textbook. See the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles for guidelines about what is and is not appropriate for medical articles on Wikipedia. Graham 87 15:34, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * It appears that you awarded this to yourself, which is not usually done, but I know you're new around here. You might want to read about WP:Barnstars.  Welcome to WP, and happy editing!  -- Scray (talk) 19:28, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Paediatric Congestive Cardiac Failure


Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Paediatric Congestive Cardiac Failure. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Heart failure. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Heart failure - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 12:50, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Your contribution
Thank you very much for your contribution to many medical articles which desperately need some improvement. Although I noticed many of your edits were reverted with the edit summary saying Wikipedia is not a medical textbook. Please take a look at the discussion page of the Wikiproject Medicine and let us know if you have any questions about how to add your content to the articles. Thank you! NCurse work 13:03, 31 July 2011 (UTC)