User talk:Aks163

Peer Review of Motivated Reasoning
The first sentence of the article is spot on as you introduce the founders of the theory. Next, the definition is clear and easy to understand, especially with the links to other pages. The quote in the first paragraph seems to be accurately referenced. The online does not seem as accurate as the first and/or second paragraphs could be the lead but the lead section looks empty. Caj94 (talk) 21:18, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Peer review of Motivated reasoning
Everything was relevant to the article. Article keeps a neutral tone throughout. Citations are functional, and citations are of relevant research/ information. Information appears to be up to date, and includes recent research involving COVID 19 — Preceding unsigned comment added by XenosisTwo (talk • contribs) 18:37, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Aks163, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Brianda and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Brianda (Wiki Ed) (talk) 22:32, 10 March 2023 (UTC)