User talk:Akshat2103/Archive 65

Sourcing
Welcome to Wikipedia. It is not enough just to say in an edit summary, "This is reliable because I got it from a book." You must actually provide a complete citation according to our guidelines. If you don't, you are going to be reverted, and may end up being blocked altogether. Leaving all-caps edit summaries (in other words, yelling) that you're correct and demanding that your inadequate contributions not be reverted is not appropriate at all.

Also: Using text-ese abbreviations like "plz" is considered very disrespectful and rude here (and in most professional settings). I recommend writing actual words, with correct grammar, capitalisation, and punctuation. Thanks. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  19:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Talk page conduct and requests
Please sign comments on talk pages. Typing four ~ characters in a row will do this for you.

But, no, you may not add anything sourced to someone's Twitter feed. Did you read WP:RS and WP:V?

And I am no longer going to respond to any messages that disrespectfully ask me to "plz" do something. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  19:21, 15 January 2021 (UTC)


 * YOU CANNOT CITE TO TWITTER. I am absolutely yelling here because you are absolutely failing to comprehend a bedrock principle of the encyclopedia: if there is not a RELIABLE published source—and Twitter feeds in this context are not reliable—you cannot put that content in the encyclopedia.


 * I ask you, from here on out, to ask your questions at WP:TEAHOUSE, because I don't have time to try to reason with you. I appreciate that you want to help the encyclopedia, but arguing that a non-reliable source is somehow reliable, even when community consensus is otherwise, is not remotely helpful. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  20:32, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Sarika9140, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Fuck did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Introduction tutorial
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or. Again, welcome.  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  18:59, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello Mam, sorry fro sending useless and long messages. I know your job is very difficult as you have to work long and get salary thus you get irritated from useless messages. Now, coming to main point. But I am contacting here as in English IRC channel, I have been banned for 1 day. I have made many edits in Marc Morris article(upto 79% edits). It is my eleventh edit, thus, I humble request you to see my edit properly and deeply along with reliability of citations (sources) and remove any line if violating Wikipedia's policy. Note: I shall not contact you as I am unbanned on English IRC (tommorow). Sarika9140 (talk) 04:02, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Marc Morris
After looking hard at the state of the article after all of your efforts to improve the article, I had to - in the end - revert to a previous version. A couple of notes: "earls" are a sort of high status person in medieval England, and the word should not have been changed to "early". Also, on what basis did you decide that the Marc Morris who co-authored the book "Art of the Nasty" is the same Marc Morris who is a medieval historian? I can't rule out the possibility, but without citing a source, there's no way this attribution can be made in the article.  — jmcgnh (talk) (contribs) 05:15, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mother Bird (sculpture) (January 17)
 Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Mother_Bird_(sculpture) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Theroadislong (talk) 20:51, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Protoplasm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Opacity. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Mother Bird (sculpture) has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Mother Bird (sculpture). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 11:26, 18 January 2021 (UTC)