User talk:AkshayJuneja.INDIA

October 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 19:23, 2 October 2022 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 16:53, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Plz check the source of Information I added in the change. I also visited that Temple many times personally. It is a Wikipedia Page I added in link as evidence. Thank U. AkshayJuneja.INDIA (talk) 17:04, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Neither other Wikipedia pages nor your own personal experience may be used to support article content. Please see the relevant policies at WP:V and WP:RS for information about required sourcing. MrOllie (talk) 17:13, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

If you don't consider Wikipedia reliable then what is the reliability of your Wikipedia website and information on it? You are working on Wikipedia and telling me that other Wikipedia page is not reliable? If Wikipedia is not reliable and we cannot use it like that, then I am going to write complaint with your Name to Wikipedia Owner and Authorities and ask about this matter and I am also going to delete my ID on Wikipedia now. Why should I waste my time on a website who don't even rely on their own pages. Thank U very much. AkshayJuneja.INDIA (talk) 17:22, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * That is correct. Wikipedia is not reliable. As you have seen, anyone can edit it at any time, which means that incorrect information may be in the encyclopedia until someone notices and corrects it. In fact, that is why reliable external sources are required, as explained in the policies I have already linked for you. MrOllie (talk) 17:33, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

May I know MrOllie what is your designation in Wikipedia? Why are you creating problems for a genuine change? I gave a page on source for that change. If you don't feel it is reliable than you should also correct that page too. AkshayJuneja.INDIA (talk) 17:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I have no idea what you mean by 'designation'. Sources are required by policy, and the types of sources used have minimum standards, as I have explained to you (twice). If you have further questions about sourcing or Wikipedia in general, feel free to ask them at WP:TEAHOUSE. - MrOllie (talk) 17:45, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

According to your answer Mr Ollie sources used have some minimum standard. If you cannot rely on other old Wikiepdia page for a change you are challenging Wikipedia itself and telling me that Wikipedia pages have not any standard by your own. I will ask by writing to your authorities and If you are right then I will not waste my time on this website anymore. AkshayJuneja.INDIA (talk) 17:55, 4 October 2022 (UTC)