User talk:Akshay Shivdas

December 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Varna (Hinduism) has been reverted. Your edit here to Varna (Hinduism) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.isca.in/IJSS/Archive/v5/i12/8.ISCA-IRJSS-2016-173.php) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 19:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Hello, the bot already rejected your source. No paper from this journal will be allowed. You should stop trying to add it. All the best! -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:00, 26 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Ok. I thought the bot rejected the link because I didn't mention the reference properly. But, since the cited reference was from a published Journal having ISSN number, I supposed, the reference complied the terms and policies of Wikipedia. So, with all due respect Sir, I wish to ask why can't any paper from this journal will be allowed?


 * Please see WP:NPOV, especially the sections WP:YESPOV and WP:DUE. This paper expresses views that are quite far off the established views on the topic and they cannot be included unless they are accepted by a large section of the academic community. Even then, being opinions, they will need to be attributed to the author (who has the same name as you ironically). -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:48, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Oh, and the journal itself, even though it claims to be "peer-reviewed", apparently has problems. The Wikipedia community seems to have ruled it out as a reliable source. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 09:50, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Some of the material was copied directly from the source document, and thus was a copyright violation. Please don't add copyright material to this wiki. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for your valuable remarks and suggestions. I am entirely convinced by it. But since there are a lot of adulterations, mistranslations and wrong interpretations on Scriptures of Hinduism, they send a wrong message about the knowledge contained in those scriptures. Varna system is a victim of it. If you consider Rigveda, in the entire Rigved nowhere the verse of Varna System is related to humans. Neither it says birth or actions will be a parameter to classify humans permanently into a Varna. Varna System is a permanent truth and Caste system is a subset of wrong interpretations of it. Anyways, you people are more learned and intellectual, I am just a learning college student. And yes, that paper is also my own work. The Journal claimed that it is peer reviewed and hence I published my work on it. I humbly request you to research more on Varna system and delink it from the caste system so that caste system in our society could be abolished. Thank you once again.