User talk:Akshaylike

December 2014
Hello, I'm Stesmo. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Meditation because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Stesmo (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Trendin.com


A tag has been placed on Trendin.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dmol (talk) 09:44, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Markelytics Solutions


A tag has been placed on Markelytics Solutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate,. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 07:20, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

January 2016
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Markelytics Solutions. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 07:29, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Affiliation to Companies
Hi! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I would like to know if you are in any way affiliated to any particular company. This is in keeping with the guidelines on Conflict of Interest. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 09:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Lemongirl942 I am not affiliated to any company, I contribute to wikipedia in my free time. Thanks. -- Akshaylike


 * Hi! Please don't be alarmed. There is generally no problem in being affiliated to a company. It is just important to declare the connection to keep everything transparent. There have been cases of PR agencies editing Wikipedia and once this was found out, it created a huge PR disaster. It is important that you read the conflict of interest guidelines properly and let me know if you have anything to disclose. Thank you. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 10:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi, I actually work for an education company. Thanks for the info though!


 * Thank you. Were you connected to Markelytics Solutions by any chance? --Lemongirl942 (talk) 11:11, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Tally Solutions for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tally Solutions is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Tally Solutions& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  HighKing++ 12:14, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Brandis India


A tag has been placed on Brandis India, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 16:03, 23 April 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vogo


A tag has been placed on Vogo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. CUPIDICAE💕 19:54, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022
Hello Akshaylike. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Akshaylike. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CUPIDICAE💕 19:55, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am not being paid to write this article or page directly or indirectly. Just let me know if there's any text that appears promotional, would be happy to edit or modify the same to comply with Wikipedia policy. Otherwise, I don't think anything I've mentioned (along with news articles for your reference) is remotely close to being promotional. Akshaylike (talk) 04:07, 12 February 2022 (UTC)